The FBI's Mafia-Style Justice: To Fight Crime, The FBI Sponsors 15 Crimes A Day

Authored by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.”

- Friedrich Nietzsche

Almost every tyranny being perpetrated by the U.S. government against the citizenry - purportedly to keep us safe and the nation secure - has come about as a result of some threat manufactured in one way or another by our own government.

Think about it.

Cyberwarfare. Terrorism. Bio-chemical attacks. The nuclear arms race. Surveillance. The drug wars. Domestic extremism. The COVID-19 pandemic.

In almost every instance, the U.S. government (often spearheaded by the FBI) has in its typical Machiavellian fashion sown the seeds of terror domestically and internationally in order to expand its own totalitarian powers.

Who is the biggest black market buyer and stockpiler of cyberweapons (weaponized malware that can be used to hack into computer systems, spy on citizens, and destabilize vast computer networks)? The U.S. government.

Who is the largest weapons manufacturer and exporter in the world, such that they are literally arming the world? The U.S. government.

Which country has a history of secretly testing out dangerous weapons and technologies on its own citizens? The U.S. government.

Which country has conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins? The U.S. government.

What country has a pattern and practice of entrapment that involves targeting vulnerable individuals, feeding them with the propaganda, know-how and weapons intended to turn them into terrorists, and then arresting them as part of an elaborately orchestrated counterterrorism sting? The U.S. government.

Are you getting the picture yet?

The U.S. government isn’t protecting us from terrorism.

The U.S. government is creating the terror. It is, in fact, the source of the terror.

Consider that this very same government has taken every bit of technology sold to us as being in our best interests—GPS devices, surveillance, nonlethal weapons, etc.—and used it against us, to track, control and trap us.

So why is the government doing this? Money, power and total domination.

We’re not dealing with a government that exists to serve its people, protect their liberties and ensure their happiness. Rather, these are the diabolical machinations of a make-works program carried out on an epic scale whose only purpose is to keep the powers-that-be permanently (and profitably) employed.

Case in point: the FBI.

The government’s henchmen have become the embodiment of how power, once acquired, can be so easily corrupted and abused. Indeed, far from being tough on crime, FBI agents are also among the nation’s most notorious lawbreakers.

Whether the FBI is planting undercover agents in churches, synagogues and mosques; issuing fake emergency letters to gain access to Americans’ phone records; using intimidation tactics to silence Americans who are critical of the government, or persuading impressionable individuals to plot acts of terror and then entrapping them, the overall impression of the nation’s secret police force is that of a well-dressed thug, flexing its muscles and doing the boss’ dirty work.

For example, this is the agency that used an undercover agent/informant to seek out and groom an impressionable young man, cultivating his friendship, gaining his sympathy, stoking his outrage over the injustices perpetrated by the U.S. government, then enlisting his help to blow up the Herald Square subway station. Despite the fact that Shahawar Matin Siraj ultimately refused to plant a bomb at the train station, he was arrested for conspiring to do so at the urging of his FBI informant and used to bolster the government’s track record in foiling terrorist plots. Of course, no mention was made of the part the government played in fabricating the plot, recruiting a would-be bomber, and setting him up to take the fall.

This is the government’s answer to precrime: first, foster activism by stoking feelings of outrage and injustice by way of secret agents and informants; second, recruit activists to carry out a plot (secretly concocted by the government) to challenge what they see as government corruption; and finally, arrest those activists for conspiring against the government before they can actually commit a crime.

It’s a diabolical plot with far-reaching consequences for every segment of the population, no matter what one’s political leanings.

As Rozina Ali writes for The New York Times Magazine, “The government’s approach to counterterrorism erodes constitutional protections for everyone, by blurring the lines between speech and action and by broadening the scope of who is classified as a threat.”

This is not an agency that appears to understand, let alone respect, the limits of the Constitution.

Just recently, it was revealed that the FBI has been secretly carrying out an entrapment scheme in which it used a front company, ANOM, to sell purportedly hack-proof phones to organized crime syndicates and then used those phones to spy on them as they planned illegal drug shipments, plotted robberies and put out contracts for killings using those boobytrapped phones.

All told, the FBI intercepted 27 million messages over the course of 18 months.

What this means is that the FBI was also illegally spying on individuals using those encrypted phones who may not have been involved in any criminal activity whatsoever.

Even reading a newspaper article is now enough to get you flagged for surveillance by the FBI. The agency served a subpoena on USA Today / Gannett to provide the internet addresses and mobile phone information for everyone who read a news story online on a particular day and time about the deadly shooting of FBI agents.

This is the danger of allowing the government to carry out widespread surveillance, sting and entrapment operations using dubious tactics that sidestep the rule of law: “we the people” become suspects and potential criminals, while government agents, empowered to fight crime using all means at their disposal, become indistinguishable from the corrupt forces they seek to vanquish.  

To go after terrorists, they become terrorists. To go after drug smugglers, they become drug smugglers. To go after thieves, they become thieves.

For instance, when the FBI raided a California business that was suspected of letting drug dealers anonymously stash guns, drugs and cash in its private vaults, agents seized the contents of all the  safety deposit boxes and filed forfeiture motions to keep the contents, which include millions of dollars’ worth of valuables owned by individuals not accused of any crime whatsoever.

It’s hard to say whether we’re dealing with a kleptocracy (a government ruled by thieves), a kakistocracy (a government run by unprincipled career politicians, corporations and thieves that panders to the worst vices in our nature and has little regard for the rights of American citizens), or if we’ve gone straight to an idiocracy.  

This certainly isn’t a constitutional democracy, however.

Some days, it feels like the FBI is running its own crime syndicate complete with mob rule and mafia-style justice.

In addition to creating certain crimes in order to then “solve” them, the FBI also gives certain informants permission to break the law, “including everything from buying and selling illegal drugs to bribing government officials and plotting robberies,” in exchange for their cooperation on other fronts.

USA Today estimates that agents have authorized criminals to engage in as many as 15 crimes a day (5600 crimes a year). Some of these informants are getting paid astronomical sums: one particularly unsavory fellow, later arrested for attempting to run over a police officer, was actually paid $85,000 for his help laying the trap for an entrapment scheme.

In a stunning development reported by The Washington Post, a probe into misconduct by an FBI agent resulted in the release of at least a dozen convicted drug dealers from prison.

In addition to procedural misconduct, trespassing, enabling criminal activity, and damaging private property, the FBI’s laundry list of crimes against the American people includes surveillance, disinformation, blackmail, entrapment, intimidation tactics, and harassment.

For example, the Associated Press lodged a complaint with the Dept. of Justice after learning that FBI agents created a fake AP news story and emailed it, along with a clickable link, to a bomb threat suspect in order to implant tracking technology onto his computer and identify his location. Lambasting the agency, AP attorney Karen Kaiser railed, “The FBI may have intended this false story as a trap for only one person. However, the individual could easily have reposted this story to social networks, distributing to thousands of people, under our name, what was essentially a piece of government disinformation.”

Then again, to those familiar with COINTELPRO, an FBI program created to “disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and neutralize” groups and individuals the government considers politically objectionable, it should come as no surprise that the agency has mastered the art of government disinformation.

The FBI has been particularly criticized in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks for targeting vulnerable individuals and not only luring them into fake terror plots but actually equipping them with the organization, money, weapons and motivation to carry out the plots—entrapment—and then jailing them for their so-called terrorist plotting. This is what the FBI characterizes as “forward leaning—preventative—prosecutions.”

Another fallout from 9/11, National Security Letters, one of the many illicit powers authorized by the USA Patriot Act, allows the FBI to secretly demand that banks, phone companies, and other businesses provide them with customer information and not disclose the demands. An internal audit of the agency found that the FBI practice of issuing tens of thousands of NSLs every year for sensitive information such as phone and financial records, often in non-emergency cases, is riddled with widespread violations.

The FBI’s surveillance capabilities, on a par with the National Security Agency, boast a nasty collection of spy tools ranging from Stingray devices that can track the location of cell phones to Triggerfish devices which allow agents to eavesdrop on phone calls. 

In one case, the FBI actually managed to remotely reprogram a “suspect’s” wireless internet card so that it would send “real-time cell-site location data to Verizon, which forwarded the data to the FBI.”

The FBI has also repeatedly sought to expand its invasive hacking powers to allow agents to hack into any computer, anywhere in the world.

Indeed, for years now, the U.S. government has been creating what one intelligence insider referred to as a cyber-army capable of offensive attacks. As Reuters reported back in 2013:

Even as the U.S. government confronts rival powers over widespread Internet espionage, it has become the biggest buyer in a burgeoning gray market where hackers and security firms sell tools for breaking into computers. The strategy is spurring concern in the technology industry and intelligence community that Washington is in effect encouraging hacking and failing to disclose to software companies and customers the vulnerabilities exploited by the purchased hacks. That's because U.S. intelligence and military agencies aren't buying the tools primarily to fend off attacks. Rather, they are using the tools to infiltrate computer networks overseas, leaving behind spy programs and cyber-weapons that can disrupt data or damage systems.

As part of this cyberweapons programs, government agencies such as the NSA have been stockpiling all kinds of nasty malware, viruses and hacking tools that can “steal financial account passwords, turn an iPhone into a listening device, or, in the case of Stuxnet, sabotage a nuclear facility.”

In fact, the NSA was responsible for the threat posed by the “WannaCry” or “Wanna Decryptor” malware worm which—as a result of hackers accessing the government’s arsenal—hijacked more than 57,000 computers and crippled health care, communications infrastructure, logistics, and government entities in more than 70 countries.

Mind you, the government was repeatedly warned about the dangers of using criminal tactics to wage its own cyberwars. It was warned about the consequences of blowback should its cyberweapons get into the wrong hands.

The government chose to ignore the warnings.

That’s exactly how the 9/11 attacks unfolded.

First, the government helped to create the menace that was al-Qaida and then, when bin Laden had left the nation reeling in shock (despite countless warnings that fell on tone-deaf ears), it demanded—and was given—immense new powers in the form of the USA Patriot Act in order to fight the very danger it had created.

This has become the shadow government’s modus operandi regardless of which party controls the White House: the government creates a menace—knowing full well the ramifications such a danger might pose to the public—then without ever owning up to the part it played in unleashing that particular menace on an unsuspecting populace, it demands additional powers in order to protect “we the people” from the threat.

Yet the powers-that-be don’t really want us to feel safe.

They want us cowering and afraid and willing to relinquish every last one of our freedoms in exchange for their phantom promises of security.

As a result, it’s the American people who pay the price for the government’s insatiable greed and quest for power.

We’re the ones to suffer the blowback.

Blowback is a term originating from within the American Intelligence community, denoting the unintended consequences, unwanted side-effects, or suffered repercussions of a covert operation that fall back on those responsible for the aforementioned operations.

As historian Chalmers Johnson explains, “blowback is another way of saying that a nation reaps what it sows.”

Unfortunately, “we the people” are the ones who keep reaping what the government sows.

We’re the ones who suffer every time, directly and indirectly, from the blowback.

Suffice it to say that when and if a true history of the FBI is ever written, it will not only track the rise of the American police state but it will also chart the decline of freedom in America: how a nation that once abided by the rule of law and held the government accountable for its actions has steadily devolved into a police state where justice is one-sided, a corporate elite runs the show, representative government is a mockery, police are extensions of the military, surveillance is rampant, privacy is extinct, and the law is little more than a tool for the government to browbeat the people into compliance.

This is how tyranny rises and freedom falls.

We can persuade ourselves that life is still good, that America is still beautiful, and that “we the people” are still free. However, as science fiction writer Philip K. Dick warned, “Don’t believe what you see; it’s an enthralling—[and] destructive, evil snare. Under it is a totally different world, even placed differently along the linear axis.”

In other words, as I point out Battlefield America: The War on the American People, all is not as it seems.

The powers-that-be are not acting in our best interests.

“We the people” are not free.

The government is not our friend.

Please share this.

Setting the record straight on the benefits, and heavy costs, of immigration to Canada

Opinion: The average recent immigrant in Canada imposes a fiscal burden of $5,300 annually.

In a recent campaign speech, Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada, cited the results of one of our studies, which showed that recent immigrants are imposing a heavy fiscal burden on Canadians. He used this information to justify his plan to reduce future levels of immigration.

The CBC had journalist Jonathon Gatehouse do a “fact check” of Bernier’s claim about the fiscal burden. In a publication sponsored by the CBC, he concludes that this claim is “false.” Since this verdict implies that our study also reached false conclusions, we feel compelled to do our own fact check of the analysis produced by Gatehouse.

The author makes much of the well-known fact that immigrants have a positive effect on aggregate national income (GDP), which says nothing about the fiscal burden. He also fails to note that recent immigrants have lowered Canada’s per capita income since, according to official statistics, they have lower average incomes than other Canadians.

He also cites a number of published studies and data he considers relevant. They involve well-known facts and again tell us nothing about the fiscal burden. For example, he notes that the gap in the unemployment rate between recent immigrants and native-born Canadian males has narrowed, but neglects to mention that this always happens when an economic boom creates increased demand for labour and leads to the hiring of previously unemployable workers.

Another statistic Gatehouse cited is that the wages received by immigrants who entered the labour market in 2017 were the highest ever. These wages have indeed been increasing every year, along with the wages of all new labour force entrants. The fact that the average incomes of immigrants who arrived in 2006 increased consistently over the following 10 years simply reflects the normal increase in incomes of all workers through time due to increased skills and work experience. As working immigrants go through this cycle, their average income rises relative to the average income of Canadians of all ages.

Estimating the fiscal burden immigrants impose on Canadians requires data on the average taxes paid and government benefits received by immigrants. Data from the 2016 Census also cited by Gatehouse shows that the average income of recent immigrants aged 25-54 continues to fall short of that of non-immigrants, which means they continue to pay less in taxes on average.

In our most recent study we used basic statistics from the previous census and the National Household Survey to estimate that because of Canada’s progressive income tax system, recent immigrants paid much lower income taxes than non-immigrants. We added to this amount other taxes related to income and wealth, such as the GST and capital gains taxes, and concluded that in 2008-09, recent immigrants on average paid $13,100 in tax compared with $18,000 paid by other Canadians, yielding a shortfall of $4,900 per year.

The government publishes statistics on how much it spends to provide different types of benefits. In the absence of all the required information, we assumed that immigrants received the same benefits on average as did other Canadians. This assumption seems reasonable since nearly all spending was on universal health care, social insurance, education, security and conservation of the environment.

In response to criticism, we estimated that with their lower incomes immigrants benefit less from government spending on protection but, because they have more children on average, benefit more from spending on education. The net effect of these adjustments is that immigrants on average receive $414 more than non-immigrants in benefits.

Gatehouse noted that in our study we had not taken account of welfare and other social benefits received by immigrants, which some believe to be excessive and others believe to be less than what non-immigrants receive. We deliberately avoided this controversial issue and assumed simply that both groups received the same average amount of such benefits. The greatest differences between recent immigrants and others is on the tax, not the spending side of the government accounts.

When we combined our estimates of taxes paid and benefits received we found that the average recent immigrant in Canada imposes a fiscal burden of $5,300 annually.

According to government statistics, in 2010 the number of recent immigrants (since 1985) was about 3.7 million. Multiplying this number by $5,300 brings the estimated fiscal burden that year to $20 billion. Since then the stock of immigrants has increased by 250,000 a year and raised the annual fiscal burden in 2018 to over $30 billion.

Canada needs a full discussion of its immigration policy that considers both its benefits, which are discussed by politicians and the media all the time, but also its very real costs, which involve not just the fiscal burden but also traffic congestion, overcrowding of hospitals, schools and recreational facilities, deteriorating environment and lack of affordable housing, which governments cannot address in part because of the fiscal burden. A lot of roads, affordable housing and cleaner environment could be purchased with that $30 billion.

Herbert Grubel is professor emeritus of economics at Simon Fraser University. Patrick Grady is with global-economics.ca 

https://financialpost.com/opinion/setting-the-record-straight-on-the-benefits-and-heavy-costs-of-immigration-to-canada 

Please share this.

Big Pharma and Media Are Puppets for These 2 Firms

Story at-a-glance

• Big Pharma and mainstream media are largely owned by two asset management firms: BlackRock and Vanguard
• Drug companies are driving COVID-19 responses — all of which, so far, have endangered rather than optimized public health — and mainstream media have been willing accomplices in spreading their propaganda, a false official narrative that leads the public astray and fosters fear based on lies
• Vanguard and BlackRock are the top two owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the U.S. media landscape
• BlackRock and Vanguard form a secret monopoly that own just about everything else you can think of too. In all, they have ownership in 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. When you add in the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms
• Vanguard is the largest shareholder of BlackRock. Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a unique structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern, but many of the oldest, richest families in the world can be linked to Vanguard funds

What does The New York Times and a majority of other legacy media have in common with Big Pharma? Answer: They’re largely owned by BlackRock and the Vanguard Group, the two largest asset management firms in the world. Moreover, it turns out these two companies form a secret monopoly that own just about everything else you can think of too. As reported in the featured video:^1,2

“The stock of the world’s largest corporations are owned by the same institutional investors. They all own each other. This means that ‘competing’ brands, like Coke and Pepsi aren’t really competitors, at all, since their stock is owned by exactly the same investment companies, investment funds, insurance companies, banks and in some cases, governments.

The smaller investors are owned by larger investors. Those are owned by even bigger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have often seen …They are Vanguard and BlackRock.

The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly.

A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost everything.’”

Who Are the Vanguard?

The word “vanguard” means “the foremost position in an army or fleet advancing into battle,” and/or “the leading position in a trend or movement.” Both are fitting descriptions of this global behemoth, owned by globalists pushing for a Great Reset, the core of which is the transfer of wealth and ownership from the hands of the many into the hands of the very few.

Interestingly, Vanguard is the largest shareholder of BlackRock, as of March 2021.^3,4 Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a “unique” corporate structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern. It’s owned by its various funds, which in turn are owned by the shareholders. Aside from these shareholders, it has no outside investors and is not publicly traded.⁵ As reported in the featured video:^6,7

“The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%.

In other words, these two investment companies, Vanguard and BlackRock hold a monopoly in all industries in the world and they, in turn are owned by the richest families in the world, some of whom are royalty and who have been very rich since before the Industrial Revolution.”

While it would take time to sift through all of Vanguard’s funds to identify individual shareholders, and therefore owners of Vanguard, a quick look-see suggests Rothschild Investment Corp.⁸ and the Edmond De Rothschild Holding are two such stakeholders.⁹ Keep the name Rothschild in your mind as you read on, as it will feature again later.

The video above also identifies the Italian Orsini family, the American Bush family, the British Royal family, the du Pont family, the Morgans, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers, as Vanguard owners.

BlackRock/Vanguard Own Big Pharma

According to Simply Wall Street, in February 2020, BlackRock and Vanguard were the two largest shareholders of GlaxoSmithKline, at 7% and 3.5% of shares respectively.¹⁰ At Pfizer, the ownership is reversed, with Vanguard being the top investor and BlackRock the second-largest stockholder.¹¹

Keep in mind that stock ownership ratios can change at any time, since companies buy and sell on a regular basis, so don’t get hung up on percentages. The bottom line is that BlackRock and Vanguard, individually and combined, own enough shares at any given time that we can say they easily control both Big Pharma and the centralized legacy media — and then some.

Why does this matter? It matters because drug companies are driving COVID-19 responses — all of which, so far, have endangered rather than optimized public health — and mainstream media have been willing accomplices in spreading their propaganda, a false official narrative that has, and still is, leading the public astray and fosters fear based on lies.

To have any chance of righting this situation, we must understand who the central players are, where the harmful dictates are coming from, and why these false narratives are being created in the first place.

As noted in Global Justice Now’s December 2020 report¹² “The Horrible History of Big Pharma,” we simply cannot allow drug companies — “which have a long track record of prioritizing corporate profit over people’s health” — to continue to dictate COVID-19 responses.

In it, they review the shameful history of the top seven drug companies in the world that are now developing and manufacturing drugs and gene-based “vaccines” against COVID-19, while mainstream media have helped suppress information about readily available older drugs that have been shown to have a high degree of efficacy against the infection.

BlackRock/Vanguard Own the Media

When it comes to The New York Times, as of May 2021, BlackRock is the second-largest stockholder at 7.43% of total shares, just after The Vanguard Group, which owns the largest portion (8.11%).^13,14

In addition to The New York Times, Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top two owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the U.S. media landscape.^15,16

Needless to say, if you have control of this many news outlets, you can control entire nations by way of carefully orchestrated and organized centralized propaganda disguised as journalism.

If your head is spinning already, you’re not alone. It’s difficult to describe circular and tightly interwoven relationships in a linear fashion. The world of corporate ownership is labyrinthine, where everyone seems to own everyone, to some degree.

However, the key take-home message is that two companies stand out head and neck above all others, and that’s BlackRock and Vanguard. Together, they form a hidden monopoly on global asset holdings, and through their influence over our centralized media, they have the power to manipulate and control a great deal of the world’s economy and events, and how the world views it all.

Considering BlackRock in 2018 announced that it has “social expectations” from the companies it invests in,¹⁷ its potential role as a central hub in the Great Reset and the “build back better” plan cannot be overlooked.

Add to this information showing it “undermines competition through owning shares in competing companies” and “blurs boundaries between private capital and government affairs by working closely with regulators,” and one would be hard-pressed to not see how BlackRock/Vanguard and their globalist owners might be able to facilitate the Great Reset and the so-called “green” revolution, both of which are part of the same wealth-theft scheme.

BlackRock and Vanguard Own the World

That assertion will become even clearer once you realize that this duo’s influence is not limited to Big Pharma and the media. Importantly, BlackRock also works closely with central banks around the world, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, which is a private entity, not a federal one.^18,19 It lends money to the central bank, acts as an adviser to it, and develops the central bank’s software.²⁰

In all, BlackRock and Vanguard have ownership in some 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. When you add in the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.

BlackRock/Vanguard also own shares of long list of other companies, including Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet Inc.²¹ As illustrated in the graphic of BlackRock and Vanguard’s ownership network below,²² featured in the 2017 article “These Three Firms Own Corporate America” in The Conversation, it would be near-impossible to list them all.

In all, BlackRock and Vanguard have ownership in some 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. When you add in the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.²³

A Global Monopoly Few Know Anything About

To tease out the overarching influence of BlackRock and Vanguard in the global marketplace, be sure to watch the 45-minute-long video featured at the top of this article. It provides a wide-view summary of the hidden monopoly network of Vanguard- and BlackRock-owned corporations, and their role in the Great Reset. A second much shorter video (above) offers an additional review of this information.

How can we tie BlackRock/Vanguard — and the globalist families that own them — to the Great Reset? Barring a public confession, we have to look at the relationships between these behemoth globalist-owned corporations and consider the influence they can wield through those relationships. As noted by Lew Rockwell:²⁴

“When Lynn Forester de Rothschild wants the United States to be a one-party country (like China) and doesn’t want voter ID laws passed in the U.S., so that more election fraud can be perpetrated to achieve that end, what does she do?

She holds a conference call with the world’s top 100 CEOs and tells them to publicly decry as ‘Jim Crow’ Georgia’s passing of an anti-corruption law and she orders her dutiful CEOs to boycott the State of Georgia, like we saw with Coca-Cola and Major League Baseball and even Hollywood star, Will Smith.

In this conference call, we see shades of the Great Reset, Agenda 2030, the New World Order. The UN wants to make sure, as does [World Economic Forum founder and executive chairman Klaus] Schwab that in 2030, poverty, hunger, pollution and disease no longer plague the Earth.

To achieve this, the UN wants taxes from Western countries to be split by the mega corporations of the elite to create a brand-new society. For this project, the UN says we need a world government — namely the UN, itself.”

As I’ve reviewed in many previous articles, it seems quite clear that the COVID-19 pandemic was orchestrated to bring about this New World Order — the Great Reset — and the 45-minute video featured at top of article does a good job of explaining how this was done. And at the heart of it all, the “heart” toward which all global wealth streams flow, we find BlackRock and Vanguard.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/15/does-vanguard-and-blackrock-own-the-world.aspx?ui=29438b937ac740a0aa628aea25d6ad69f6511682ee804359588b6688fee931d6&sd=19000101&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20210615&mid=DM911263&rid=1183885545&p4=20060915&p5=

Please share this.

Eight Roman Catholic Priests Survive Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Blast Through the Power of the Rosary...

8 Jesuit priests living just 8 blocks from ground zero miraculously survived the atomic blast at Hiroshima on August 6, 1945.   Everyone else within a radius of roughly 1.5 Kilometres was reportedly killed instantly, and those outside the range died of radiation within days.

However, the only physical harm to Fr. Shiffer was that he could feel a few pieces of glass in the back of his neck.

The priests have been examined over 200 times by scientists. Each time the priests repeated the same explanation for their survival, "We believe that we survived because we were living the message of Fatima.".

Next to the Pope my authority on all things Catholic is my devout 89-year-old father-in-law, a long retired “government worker” from an agency that shall go unnamed.  He possesses an encyclopedic knowledge of physics, history, politics and religion with a special interest in “supernatural” miracles of the Bible and Divine miracles in general.

So recently, after my husband and I had watched an interesting documentary on the making of the atomic bomb known as “The Manhattan Project,” we both agreed that Dad would also enjoy the program and the next time he came over we would replay it for him.

Today was that day.

So after he watched it, I asked my father-in-law if he had enjoyed the documentary. He said he did, but already knew much of the story. (Of course!)

However, he expressed disappointment that the documentary did not mention a group of Jesuit priests who survived the Hiroshima bomb blast without any major injuries at ground zero.

I told him this oversight was not surprising since it was, after all, a History Channel documentary but I still doubted the truth of this miraculous Hiroshima tale.

As Dad began to describe what he said was surely a Divine miracle, I hopped on Google and entered “Jesuit priests survived Hiroshima”. To my surprise, instantly there appeared numerous links to this amazing, true story now almost lost in the sands of time.

Here are the basic facts of this historical occurrence.

In Hiroshima, a group of eight Jesuit priests lived in a presbytery near the parish church less than a mile away from where the first atomic bomb ever dropped on a city exploded well within the total death and devastation radius. Keep in mind this was a blast that killed 80,000 people almost instantly and up to a total of 140,000 eventually.

At Hiroshima “Little Boy” destroyed over two-thirds of the buildings.

All eight priests in their home building sat in the direct kill zone while for miles around nothing but ashes remained. They were not only “virtually unscathed from the effects of the bomb” but none of the group suffered either the ill-effects of radiation or major injuries from the bomb blast.  Furthermore, while their building received some damaged, unlike others it still stood.

While it is true that small numbers of other civilians in the blast area survived, all presumably suffered, and most if not all eventually died from radiation sickness.

What is truly miraculous is that radiation sickness did not affect ANY of the Jesuits at that time or decades later.

Why were these eight priests spared in an area of total death and destruction?

In 1976, when all the eight Jesuit priests still lived, one of the survivors, a German named Father Hubert Schiffer, represented the group with this answer:

We survived because we were living the message of Fatima. We lived and prayed the Rosary daily in that home.

What is the message of Fatima, you ask?

If my father-in-law happens not to be around to address that question, here is the answer from a 2010 Catholic Herald article that goes into much detail about this event.

The essence of the Fatima message concerns conversion from sin and a return to God, and involves reparation for one’s own sins and the sins of others, as well as the offering up of one’s daily sufferings and trials.

There is much theology wrapped up in that answer and even more in the Catholic Herald article offering layers of theological explanations as to why those eight priests miraculously survived and even lived into advanced age.

But here is the quickie 30 second version.

August 6th, the day the bomb fell on Hiroshima, also happens to be when the Catholic Church annually celebrates the Feast of the Transfiguration.

The New Testament tells how Jesus went up to a high mountain and was “transfigured” before his apostles Peter, James and John. The Book of Matthew reads in 17:2 “his face shone like the sun, and his garments became a white as light”. (First hint, similar to what the residents of Hiroshima would have seen seconds after the bomb was dropped.)

Now, fast forward ahead to the 1917 Miracle of Fatima in Portugal, commonly known as the Miracle of the Sun.

Here, the Virgin Mary appeared to three children on six different occasions and gave them prophetic messages. To then confirm that her messages were from God, in front of 70,000 people the sun appeared to spin in the sky, change colors and begin to fall to earth, but then stabilized.

(Second hint, the atomic bomb blast was as bright as the sun and fell to earth.)

Finally, there are the eight priests, who by their own account “survived because we were living the message of Fatima.”

These priests prayed the daily Rosary in the name of Jesus and Mary and while the man-made explosion of bright white sun light devastated the world around them they were somehow “transfigured” on the anniversary of that Feast Day, protected and shielded by God from the horrific white blast less than a mile away.

Now, you don’t have to be Catholic to acknowledge something of a miraculous and powerful nature kept those eight priests and their building from being reduced to ashes and shielded them from the effects of deadly radiation.

The good news, I believe, is that this awesome power is still available to you today.

If you want to learn more about this miracle just Google like I initially did, “Jesuit priests survive Hiroshima” and you will discover unlimited historical and religious material.

To get you started here is an eyewitness account from one of the priests as reported in a historical document on Hiroshima produced by Yale Law School.

For me, the real moral of this story is to never doubt my father-in-law who is almost 90 years of age, in good mental and physical health, and engages in daily praying of the Rosary. And just like those Hiroshima priests, he experienced what he believes were Divine miracles that spared his own life while he was serving his country in war zones and other dangerous circumstances throughout the world.

Please share this.

Justin Trudeau COVID-19 The Playbook

Please share this.

Six Minutes From World War III, the USS Liberty

Bob Moriarty

In the afternoon of June 8th, 1967 the United States came within six minutes of starting a nuclear war with the Soviet Union during the Six-Day War. At the direction of President Lyndon Johnson, US Navy aircraft from the USS America armed with nuclear weapons were ready to launch with Cairo their target. The Soviet Union told the US that soon after the first nuke went off in Egypt, another would be dropped on Jerusalem.

The conflict was a war of aggression on the part of Israel to seize more land on the road to Greater Israel. Contrary to the popular narrative espoused by Israel since 1967 that the war was in response to aggression on the part of Egypt actually the war had been years in the planning by both Israel and the United States. US Forces would enter the war on behalf of Israel based on a false flag operation similar in design to that of Operation Northwoods.

American and Zionist war planners needed a good visual target to be the subject of the false flag attack, which they would blame on Egypt. They settled on the USS Liberty, the most advanced spy ship in the US fleet. The Liberty carried a crew of 294 and was ordered to take up station near shore on the north side of the Sinai Peninsula. At the end of the unprovoked attack by unmarked IAF aircraft and later Israeli torpedo boats some 34 Americans crew died and another 171 were wounded. It was the most deadly event on a US Navy vessel during peacetime since the founding of the United States.

It's easy to understand why Israel would lie and try to hide the facts of what happen that day for the next fifty-four years but confusing in that why would the US government and US Navy led the parade of deceit for so long.

The true tale of what happened that day and the events that led up to it have been public for almost twenty years. An investigative reporter for The Sunday Times of London named Peter Hounam wrote a book titled, Operation Cyanide: How the Bombing of the USS Liberty Nearly Caused World War Three in 2003. He maintained the plot was a joint operation between LBJ and Israel. Planning for the Six Day War had actually taken place years before the actual commencement of battle.

Unlike President Kennedy, LBJ had never spent a day in combat even though General MacArthur awarded Johnson a Silver Star for being in a bomber that took off on a bombing mission but had to turn back because of maintenance. Those who have been in combat soon understand that no matter how great your war plans, the enemy gets a vote.

The Liberty should have sunk after being attacked for over an hour and a quarter by multiple unmarked aircraft and several PT boats flying the Israeli flag. The PT boats fired five torpedoes at the Liberty at point blank range. They only managed to hit with one. The incompetence of the Israeli navy may have prevented World War Three. The Russians were well aware of both the plans for the attack and the actual attack. They notified the Secretary of Defense and President Johnson that if the US nuked Cairo the USSR would nuke Jerusalem in response.

Hounam’s book was never a best seller even though it contained more information than any report going back to 1967. It’s just not the kind of book that most readers would pick up because it conflicted with the narrative made up by Israel and the US that the attack by Israel was a tragic mistake. A tragic mistake is when the Israeli navy machine-gunned the life rafts of the Liberty in an attempt to make sure all the Americans were killed. They had the unlimited gall to cut one life raft free and took it back to their base. Today it sits in an Israeli war museum as a trophy of their victory over the US Navy and the American people.

Lately a group has done extensive research into the attack and interviewed a number of survivors and put together a four hour and fourteen minute documentary titled Sacrificing Liberty available in either a video on demand for $12.99 or four DVD set for $19.99. I bought the DVD set.

It is compelling.

I was a 20-year-old Marine lieutenant attending the Army Basic Intelligence School in Fort Holabird, Maryland in the summer of 1967 when the attack took place. It was inconceivable to anyone in the US military in the 1960s that Israeli could make such a mistake. Even at the time it seemed pretty strange to me that the highly vaunted Israelis could confuse a US ship for an enemy vessel.

Of course it wasn’t a mistake. It was a deliberate attack. The video called Sacrificing Liberty tells the whole story including how Lyndon Johnson surrounded himself with fanatic Zionists including having his own Mossad supplied whore. The video claims Johnson’s parents were Jewish and we know his daughter is a practicing Jew. Just whom did Johnson work for?

The video will leave the viewers with a sour taste in their mouths. The survivors of the Liberty get to tell their story for the very first time and it is pretty terrifying. Anyone who goes into the military needs to at least think about being attacked in combat. But who fears their supposed allies? What happens when the President of the United States is a traitor and all of those in your branch of service who you think will help you turn on you and leave you to die?

It took seventeen long hours after the attacks began before anyone from the Navy actually came to the aid of the Liberty. The survivors were taken aside and told that if they ever opened their mouths about what actually happened on June 8th they would be court-martialed. Or worse. We can only imagine what worse is.

In the video series we learn that Israel made an unprovoked attack on the basically unarmed Liberty. A fearless sailor managed to wire up the last remaining antenna on the Liberty after the first strafing attacks. When the USS Saratoga and USS America learned of the attack twice they attempted to launch aircraft to support the Liberty. Twice they were recalled at the direct order of LBJ and Secretary of Defense McNamara. When the Navy finally did show up the survivors were sent to remote duty stations all over the world and told to shut up.

Now many years later we learn in the video that the plan was a joint conspiracy to use an Operation Northwoods type false flag to murder American sailors so the US could justify an atomic bombing on Egypt on behalf of Israel. Of course Johnson was Vice President under Kennedy at the time of the Cuban Missile crisis so he would have known all about Northwoods in 1962. All he had to do in 1967 was dust off the plan and order his minions to execute the operation. And 294 Americans.

While it obviously is a good thing that Operation Cyanide didn’t start World War Three, the failed operation and ensuing cover up had long lasting ramifications on the relationship between Israel and the US. Israel was quite content to do their part in the cover-up and pretend that it was simple mistaken identity on their part and incompetence on the part of their forces so only 34 Americans died. Me bad.

Given that an American President and Secretary of Defense had literally committed treason, one of only three crimes defined in the Constitution, the attack and cover-up gave Israel not only a Get Out of Jail Free card, it had the effect of opening the Treasury of the United States and handed Israel a pen to write unlimited checks with the funds coming directly out of the pockets of American taxpayers. Today Israel gets 59% of the US foreign military assistance. Since World War II Israel has collected a total of $142 billion in aid from our taxpayers.

For those who think that since Israel is the only Democracy in the Middle East (it’s not a Democracy) and such a good friend and ally to the US so we should be funding and/or fighting all their wars for them, perhaps they should remember the attack on the Liberty, the Lavon Affair where Zionist terrorists attacked American interests in Egypt, the case of Jonathan Pollard who sent tens of thousands of top secret documents to his handlers in Israel who promptly passed them on to the Russians. After he was released from prison and finished his parole he flew to Israel and given a hero’s welcome. With friends such as Israel you don’t need enemies.

And last but hardly not least, when you finish watching Sacrificing Liberty and realize that the attack was nothing more and nothing less than an instant repeat of Operation Northwoods, if Israel and the US Government would be willing to murder 294 American military personnel in order to justify a false flag operation to nuke Egypt, why wouldn’t they do the same thing on 9/11 organized by a bunch of dual national Americans on behalf of Israel?

In thirty US States, the Zionist have forced through laws requiring an oath of office to Israel with a promise to not boycott the country. It’s OK to boycott Trump. It’s also OK to boycott Biden or K. Harris or the Pope or Japan or Mormons or Baptists or Catholics. Actually under the 1st Amendment to the Constitution it's ok for Americans to boycott whomever they choose.

Except Israel.

Now that is power. The 1st Amendment gives all Americans freedom of speech. Except when talking about Israel.

Ever since the attack on the Liberty Israel has used its Get Out of Jail Free Card to commit any number of war crimes. It’s a state with borders that change on a daily basis that flouts all international law and utterly ignores UN resolutions. Because if anyone in the US Government fessed up to the treason outlined in Sacrificing Liberty, both the US and Israel would know the jig is up. There would be a revolution tomorrow.

The US has turned into Israel’s attack Chihuahua ready to pounce on whomever Israel orders them to. Israel isn’t above kicking the pooch now and again to keep its attention lest anyone in Congress or the Senate actually stand up and bark for America.

The relationship between the US and Israel is bad for both countries and eventually will result in the destruction of each. The rest of the world fully understands that Israel is a criminal state run by a mob of psychopaths. Catering to their demands is the very worst thing the US could do.

In 1947 the United States had no enemies in the Middle East.

In 1948 we had no friends.

http://www.321gold.com/editorials/moriarty/moriarty060821.html

Please share this.

COVID-1984 What you need to know about the virus and the vaccine

There are people greatly exaggerating the cyber-attacks which I believe were at least “inspired” by
the WEF for they have been targeting the very industries the Great Reset wants to be shut down –
meat production and fossil fuels.

They can attack individual systems and shut them down. They cannot take down the entire global
internet.

The far greater risk is that (1) the vaccines create sterility, and (2) COVID will mutate into someone
far worse next year. Additionally, they can target the gene sequence of specific ethnic groups and
create a disease today that would kill all Jews, Italians, Germans, or whoever they have determined
stands in their way.

I have key sources in mainstream media who would love to publish the truth but are blocked by
management. When early on any investigative journalist would have followed the lead of the
Wuhan lab leak and was told by the upper management that was off the table. I know also from
inside the scientific community that people have been writing papers to support this COVID agenda
that they are told to write fiction.

I know far more than I dare to even write because I cannot compromise my sources. There is
resistance and with each new leak, it is growing. Unfortunately, this World Economic Forum is as
dangerous as Hitler. They are breaking all the ethics because they believe that the ends justify the
means.

Everyone knows me. I do not make up shit for the sake of gaining readership. I am not 25 trying to
build a business or impress anyone. I can go walk the beach and feed the birds and just chill. But I
am not stupid. I know these people. I have been face to face with just about all of them and yes I
have even shaken hands with Schwab – not many can say that; they just write opinions on what they
“think” will happen.

For years I have listened to their arguments for a one-world government and laughed that it was no
different than the dream to conquer the world under Communism. This time it is different! I believe
they have the money of Soros and Gates to fund this take over of the world. I also BELIEVE that
bribes have been made to world leaders that were too great to ignore. Nevertheless, just like the
bankers who thought they could bribe their way to guaranteed perfect trades, they will also fail. You
cannot bribe your way to eliminate the cycle.. Sometimes it is simply nature like destroying the
Mongol fleets twice in their attempt to invade Japan which they said they were protected by the
Divine Wind – “Kamakasi”

From various sources, there are people out to assassinate those who have participated in the
COVID Scam. This will become much more common in 2022. I would not rule out at least attempts
to assassinate Bill Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab for starters. The worst of the anarchist
movement ALWAYS came with the decline in the Economic Confidence Model. The target year
2022 is also when the rise in assassinations should unfold.

We have entered a serious period and this stupid attempt to force the Great Reset upon the world
will fail, but it will change the playing field dramatically.

******************************************************************************

 

IMO — how this planned epidemic will unfold unless some outside influence interrupts the execution of WEF plans ……

The recently updated CDC policy to reduce the cycles used for VAXXED individuals to <25 will lower or eliminate false positives for that group. Concurrently, the cycle rate for UNVAXXED individuals is to remain at +35-40 which will continue to create +97% false positive results. Thus the number of cases advertised daily for "VAXXED" will drop and "UNVAXXED" will continue to rise.

As we then enter the next flu season, there will be a massive encouragement for everyone to take the annual flu shot (as further protection of course). This flu shot will trigger the spike proteins antibodies that have been continuously replicating within the body (and cannot be shut off). These in turn will attack the flu virus vaccine and trigger massive destruction/death/illness for those that have been mRNA vaxxed.

Authorities will then point to the decline in cases of the VAXXED and the continued high number of cases in the UNVAXXED (false positives) as proof that the vaxxes are working and are NOT the cause of the death and destruction being experienced. Instead it will be labelled as the fault of the UNVAXXED (just look at how high their their case count is).

This will lead to PHASE FIVE societal/governmental push for mandatory vaccination of the UNVAXXED as the only way to deal with ever increasing death toll from COVID-19.

For those that survive the next fall season — in early 2022 a new virus will emerge (COVID-21 — just gooogle it) that will classified as a mutated version of Covid-19 (note: that scientific experts are saying that variants have zero — yes zero — chance of being different enough to affect anything). As the death/destruction continue due to overwhelming antibodies and the spike protein attacking internal organs, yet another round of miracle mRNA shots will be ordered for immediate worldwide consumption — thus putting even more toxic spike proteins into VAXXED bodies. https://uncoverdc.com/2021/05/31/vaccine-expert-warns-we-made-a-big-mistake/

Rinse & repeat — until there are no UNVAXXED remaining and then they finally put whatever they want into the monthly/quarterly vax updates that are now mandatory in order to control the continuous creation of antibodies. Population levels can then be managed down to whatever the optimal worldwide headcount is deemed optimal.

********************************************************************************

If orchestrated from the above group, there will be people who become disenchanted or disgruntled and come out of the woodwork. The truth will come out.

Once the PCR test, the foundation of the lockdowns, is no longer churning out the asymptomatic cases over a CT score of 35, then the narrative will be exposed for what it is. A Casedemic fraud.
Yes, people died but from all causes.

I have no idea what the long-term effects of the experimental gene therapy will be on the population. The rollout for a illness that is nasty but has a survival rate over 99% for most of the population, gives the impression of a hard sell.

Please share this.