Sunday, June 30, 2013

Principles of Conspiracy Science: Conspiracy Cafe June 18, 2013

PRISM the establishment of the surveillance state in Amerika. Goebbels a 21st century lesson plan. Obama comes out of Orwell's closet. The predictive programming lesson 6/21 and 6/22 are on the table again for a solstice sacrifice. We see them. We expose them. The Simpsons in terror programming. Revolution & Defiance in the tattle mix. Is it Jericho? Father's Day Google Doodle an ever evolving changing plot matrix. LAPD WMD drill. Syria and the war of the thugs. Storm chasers or controllers? G8 Follies. Putin odd man out. Brits spied on the G20. Boston bombing DHS drill to a tee. On Conspiracy Cafe the Principles of Conspiracy Science.
Please share this.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

US Iron Curtain Is Coming in New Immigration Bill for All Americans


Orrin Hatch Author of Biometric Exit System for All Americans
GOP Senator Orrin Hatch introduced an amendment to the immigration bill that is the start of the American Iron Curtain requiring a mandatory biometric exit system at airports with the highest volume of international air travel, that even Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) wanted to do nationwide but without success previously. You will no longer be allowed to freely leave the the USA. Government will track you on a biometric basis. What’s next? DNA? This is not Paper Please! This is Papers Now!
There is new legislation that will impose not only a lifelong ban on Americans traveling if they renounce their citizenship, but if you have any money, they now want to impose an huge exit tax to leave. This is all about them getting money. Every bill is designed to strip citizens of their wealth to keep the debt rolling.
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Los Angeles) in her highway bill to “reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes”  includes Section 40304 of the legislation which states that any individual who owes more than $50,000 to the Internal Revenue Service may be subject to “action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport”. So in other words, if they think you owe any money, they can revoke your passport, put you under investigation, and you cannot travel until they say you do not owe anything. What does this have to do with highways?
Eduardo Saverin could be BANNED from the U.S. after renouncing citizenship to save millions in tax. Former Massachusetts U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan said that he wants the U.S. Attorney’s office to begin the process of revoking Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s U.S. citizenship claiming it is a benefit or some sort of gift. The problem is becoming that to be a US citizen is rapidly becoming the worst possible citizenship to have in the world for there seems to be some invisible hand behind this plot to enslave everyone as economic machines to feed government not much different that the plot in the MATRIX serious where humans are kept to generate energy for the state. Everything is about getting taxes right down to hunting offshore business to going after bullion refiners demand they account for every gram of gold coming in and out.
The entire excessive NSA gabbing everything is all about taxes. If we look at what has been going on there is clearly an invisible hand at work to confiscate wealth to keep the debt rolling. These people are absolutely destroying the world economy and liquidity is still at about 50% of 2007 levels demonstrating the impact of hunting down citizens with assets anywhere. It would be nice if they just printed money and chose the HYPERINFLATION route and we could compensate with investment strategy. But these people are not going in that direction. They are hunting citizens and legally revoking everything that was once the defining quality of a free society.
  1. Americans are taxed on their worldwide income. “The United States is the only major country which taxes based on citizenship rather than residency.” 
  2. Americans need to tell the IRS about any bank account or company they have anycontrol over. It might sound like no big deal, but add a few small investments to your portfolio and all of a sudden you’ve got a big headache on your hands. What makes it even worse is that…
  3. The US tax code is terribly complex, confusing, and expensive to comply with. This is the case even for highly experienced professionals in the game for decades.
  4. Many banks and overseas professionals won’t deal with Americans. It’s looking like this is about to get a lot worse. “The foreign banks also must provide an annual report of the account balance, gross receipts and gross withdrawals of the U.S. account holders.” 
Senators Casey and Chuck Schumer have argued to impose the penalty for citizens leaving the USA for tax reasons should be a lifetime ban from re-entering and a special Draconian tax on your net income after already paying taxes.
In 1996, the U.S. changed its immigration law to include a provision to “name and shame” renunciants… In 2008, Congress enacted… an “exit tax” … effective June 2008, U.S. citizens who renounce their citizenship are subject under certain circumstances to an expatriation tax, which is meant to extract from the expatriate taxes that would have been paid had he remained a citizen.
Slavery was supposed to be outlawed. But that only applied to private people owning others. The whole slavery thing began with the King selling you into indentured servitude for some stupid crime like taking an apple. You were put on a ship and sent to the American colonies as cheap labor for the plantation owners. When you sentence was up, you then were released but you were not given passage back to England. After the American Revolution, the Dutch replaced the criminal labor trade with Africans and the criminal were then sent to Australia.
Charles Hibbert quoted the sentence read in court in his Roots of Evil where the Judge in England said:
“Because you have committed this offence, the sentence of the court is that you shall no longer be burdened with the support of your wife and family. You shall be immediately removed from a very bad climate and a country overburdened with people to one of the finest regions of the earth where demand for human labour is every hour increasing and where it is highly probable you may ultimately regain your character and improve your future.”
(Roots of Evil, p145)
Everything they do is about money – not safety or really terrorism. This is legislative Terrorism against the people for they are not America, they are the government which is not even a reflection of the American Society any more than the Communists represented the people.
Hopefully, economics will cause our Western Governments to crash and burn just as the Communists in 1989-1991. Their greed is unsustainable and they are destroying every aspect of what use to be a free society. We tried monarchy – it became oppressive. We have tried republicanism – it has been corrupted like that of Rome. All that is left is a Greek Democracy were we all vote on all spending from home on computer. The 2 year brief term was voluntary for a Congressman. Allowing reelection they need way too much money to constantly run and so that creates lobbyists and corruption and then they introduce bills like this. Bureaucracy must be eliminated. Privatize everything for we will not have the unfunded pension problem.
We need a real democracy. No more of these people pretending to represent us when they do not – they exploit us and are now closing the Iron Curtain around us all. There are people who can see the dots and connect them. They got out of Germany. Those who claim it will be ok, they were given the free showers. Blind faith is never good. We have neither trust nor verification. We have no free press. There is nothing left of our free society but a hologram of its former self.

Please share this.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Protect Yourself Online: How To Give The NSA The Finger…Without Them Ever Noticing

In this free Sovereign Man Digital Privacy Black Paper you will learn how to reclaim your privacy and drop off the radar.

In this free Black Paper you will learn:

  1. About The Most Important Rule In Protecting Your Privacy
  2. How To Know Which Tools Are Safe…And Which Are Not
  3. The #1 Thing You Should Protect Online…And How To Do It
  4. How To Secure And Encrypt Your Emails in Three Easy Steps
  5. The Quickest Way To Chat Securely With Your Friends
  6. How To Encrypt Your Voice Calls On A Mac, PC, Android, or iOS Device…For Free
  7. And MUCH More…
This report is totally free. You don’t even have to give us your email. In fact…

Download the Report Here

Please share this.

Monday, June 24, 2013

TWA Flight 800 Documentary

In a new documentary, former investigators who looked into the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800, which killed 230, are breaking their silence to claim that the explosion that brought down the plane in 1996 was likely no accident, and that the final report on the cause of the blast was falsified.

TWA Flight 800 exploded in mid-air on July 17, 1996 about 11 minutes after taking off from New York's JFK airport on its way to Paris. Though theories abounded as to what happened to the plane -- from a bomb on the aircraft to it being struck by a missile or even a meteorite -- the National Transportation Safety Board concluded after a four-year investigation that the probable cause of the crash was an accidental fuel tank explosion. The NTSB said it could not be sure what exactly ignited the blast, but "of the sources evaluated by the investigation, the most likely was a short circuit outside of the [fuel tank] that allowed excessive voltage to enter it through electrical wiring..."

DOCUMENT: 2000 NTSB Report on TWA Flight 800's 1996 Crash
But according to the new documentary, named TWA Flight 800 and premiering on Epix next month, six former members of the official crash investigation have stepped forward to refute the NTSB's findings, saying the crash report was purposefully falsified, and to claim the investigation was "systematically undermined" by federal authorities.

"We didn't find any part of the airplane that indicated a mechanical failure," one of the whistleblowers says in a trailer for the film. The former officials allege the explosion came from outside the plane, though they don't speculate any further on the original source.

Another of the whistleblowers, former senior accident investigator with the NTSB Hank Hughes, said in a preview of the documentary that FBI agents were spotted on surveillance cameras going through the hanger where the crash evidence was kept "in the wee hours of the morning... for purposes unknown."

Some of the previous theories about the crash have been disproven in the years since and Tom Haueter, former director of Aviation Safety at the NTSB, told ABC News today that the former officials in the documentary are wrong. He said that the evidence that the explosion was an internal accident was "irrefutable."

There was "no sign" of penetration from the outside, Haueter said.

The whistleblowers are calling for the NTSB to reopen its investigation, and the NTSB said in a statement today it will reexamine the case if new evidence is presented or "on a showing that the Board's findings are erroneous."

"While the NTSB rarely re-investigates issues that have already been examined, our investigations are never closed and we can review any new information not previously considered by the Board," the NTSB said. "The TWA Flight 800 investigation lasted four years and remains one of the NTSB's most detailed investigations. Investigators took great care reviewing, documenting and analyzing facts and data and held a five-day hearing to gather additional facts before determining the probable cause of the accident during a two-day Board meeting."

In a petition to reconsider the accident sent to the NTSB, the former investigators and family members of the victims claim to have "new and material evidence and analysis that refute the NTSB's original findings."

But not all victims' families are on board with the new probe. Matt Zimkiewicz, who lost his sister on the flight, said in a letter to other victims' families, "It is a big distraction and particularly painful for families."

"Personal self-fulfilling motives by exploiting those who died on TWA800 is nauseating," he said. "It is my personal, as well as my family's position that we have full faith and confidence in the NTSB's final report on TWA800."

Please share this.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

A View From Space with Gary Bell the Spaceman, June 22, 2013

TOPICS:  Royal Jacobite blood line, House of David, House of Stuart, Lucifer, Satanism, Ascot

Due to streaming issues I only managed to record 2hrs 53min of the show player kept crashing. Just the last segment (15min) is missing, Sorry I did try searching for a full copy.

Please share this.

Rising Tide of Civil Unrest

Around the globe people are rising up as Socialism is collapsing. All the promises of a better life have allowed governments to grow like mold in a closed bag of bread. The youth have no future for as government continue to hunt down any money as the G8 leaders pledged to hunt down anyone who finds a dime in a parking lot at fails to declare it. Leaders of the G8 nations have signed an agreement to crack down on the “scourge” of tax evasion at the end of a two-day summit in Northern Ireland.
G8 Summit
Government creates NO jobs that contribute to the creation of new jobs or the national wealth. Anyone who works for government is like hiring a maid at home. They do not contribute to the income of the household, they consume who you earn. The G8 cannot stimulate job growth with new trade deals for the big corporations while destroying the global economy and who Joe Biden called the “Super Rich” who are now household income of $250,000. If you make $1 million in capital gains this year, then lose $2 million next year, you can write off $3,000 and go forward only. So if you go bust, yiou stay bust.
The Marxist hunt for taxes has led to the collapse in liquidity that is still off by 50% from 2007 levels. This is alarming! Trading volumes are down substantially and that means capital is not investing. Americans have been thrown out of Europe. HSBC will not accept any accounts from an American outside the USA including in Asia. All of this to hunt down taxes. Our political governments are infested with lawyers who know how to write and prosecute laws, but are braindead when it comes to creating an economy. They have ZERO skills in the creation department  This is the same disease that kills corporations. It is the entrepreneur who creates the entity from his vision (Henry Ford, Steve Jobs), but then the company is taken over by the accounts and lawyers who dominate the board. People like Steve Jobs are thrown out for they can only create, not manage. Then bureaucratic corporations, like government,  are incapable of creation and this causes them to take over start-ups paying a fortune to kids who can create because the board of directors lack those skills. Eventually, the corporation dies void of any creative skills. Government follows the same exact path to extinction. In ancient history it was called becoming Byzantine. Over-regulation to the point the cost of government was so oppressive the economy simply died. The same pattern emerged in Venice as the state wanted to own everything. When Florence because a corrupt bureaucracy, the same fate awaited it in the dawn. Genoa rotated the office of the Doge on an annual basis. That prevented an infestation of bureaucrats and allowed Genoa to outlast both Venice and Florence. Hence – term limits are ESSENTIAL!
Fighting Shadows
These Marxist governments that mascaraed as Democracies cannot see that they are killing the future. They are merely the same corrupt Republics that compelled Julius Caesar to cross the Rubicon. The governments infested with lawyer-bureaucrats are writing laws contrary to human nature and then prosecute anyone who dares to try to defend themselves. Government then fights the shadows in their mind fearing their loss of power like a cornered rat.
This is part of the process why I have been warning it ain’t HYPERINFLATION – it is massive DEFLATION that must be concerned about as these government destroy the very economic engine that create a coherent society. The corruption has risen to a level of intolerance beyond belief and this is just getting started as we head into 2014. The G8 hunt for taxes is causing the collapse in the world economy. They cannot see what they are doing because they only think about retaining power – never reform.
brazil_riots 2013
The degree of civil unrest is so widespread it is only a question of time before it hits the USA. The amount of people on the streets in Brazil one would think in a Democratic government of the people, leaders should pay attention. NEVER! Instead, the government has declared outright war against its own people. The key as to when will this wave of civil unrest hit the USA is tied to the economic downturn in 2015.75. People do not rise up until they have no choice. We will see government launch an all out war against the people and blood will flow in the streets precisely as we see in Brazil. This is what Homeland Security is all about – protecting American from Americans – buying 1,6 billion hollow point bullets that are illegal in war and buying tanks for DOMESTIC use. They do not need tanks for terrorists. There just aren’t that many who would need to be confronted on the streets.
Brazil was once one of the so called economic wonders that many touted would compel the US dollar to collapse. ALL of these claims about the dollar’s demise are completely ignorant of how these things unfold. The death of civilization always begins from the periphery and moves to the core or heart and then the body dies. This is NOT my OPINION – its FACT based upon studying each event WITHOUT predetermine expectations. The object is to discover how these things happen, not convince anyone that one opinion is better than another. Just the facts! We will be publishing this study on the rise and fall of Empires, Nations, and City-States so there can be no question about opinion – only facts are acceptable – nothing else. What we see in Brazil, is human nature on display and that is NO DIFFERENT than what we will see in the USA.
Bonus-Army-3If you think this cannot happen in America, the land of the free and home of the brave, I suppose you also believe in Santa Claus, Eastern Bunny, and Tooth Fairy as well. If so, go back to your bubble and pretend everything if nice there. Don’t worry – Be Happy. This is what civil unrest needs. People who ignore the trend and wait until it is too late. Then they are shocked at the events.
Remember what Martin Niemoller (1892-1984) had to say about the German Nazi. Nobody stands up until it is too late, for then there is no one left to talk to.
Bonus-Army-4The United States called out tanks and Calvary on those who fought in World War I when the Bonus Army marched on Washington DC in 1932. It was this outrageous behavior of an “elected” government against the veterans that when World War II came, government was forced to pass the GI Bill because who in their right mind would fight for a country and then government sends in fresh troops against its own veterans when they asked for their pay that had been promised? Separating government from power or a penny is like an average man trying to part the Red Sea.
This is the whole purpose behind creating killer robots that scientists are now protesting against. They fear that troops will not fire upon citizens in a revolution – machines will.
Please share this.

Friday, June 21, 2013

32 Facts That Show How Men Are Being Systematically Emasculated In America Today

What is wrong with men in America?  Why isn't our country producing lots of strong, independent, hard working men of character like it once did?  Well, many believe that it starts at a very young age.  When compared with girls, boys in the United States get lower grades, they are much more likely to get into trouble at school and they are much more likely to be put on behavior-modifying drugs.  When it comes time to pursue a higher education, most of our young men are ill-prepared to do that.  Today, nearly 60 percent of the students enrolled at U.S. colleges are women.  And of course it has become much more difficult for men to find good jobs.  In fact, less than 65 percent of all men have a job right now.  Without a good job, a man is not considered to be "marriage material", but a large percentage of our young men don't want to get married anyway.  Society has told them that it is okay to be a "slacker".  Today, far too many of our young men are far more interested in their various addictions (beer, drugs, sex, video games, gambling, etc.) than they are in starting a family.  But the truth is that men are far more happy when they have a purpose.  When men are raising families, starting businesses or doing something to transform society they feel fulfilled.

Sadly, the message that our young men are getting from our television shows and our movies is that men are idiots.  Instead of being portrayed as leaders that are eager to get married and raise strong families, young men are often being portrayed as passive slackers that love to party and chase women.

Start paying attention to how men are portrayed in the media.  In particular, pay attention to how they are portrayed in our commercials.  Our boys and young men are exposed to thousands upon thousands of hours of this "programming", and it has a dramatic affect on them.

Our system beats up our boys and young men so badly that only a relatively small percentage of them emerge into adulthood as strong, independent young men that are able to take care of themselves and start families of their own.

In America today, the percentage of men in prison is at an all-time high, the percentage of men with a job is near an all-time low and the percentage of children living without a father is at an all-time high.

Do we have a crisis on our hands?

Yes, we most definitely have a crisis on our hands.

The following are 32 facts that show how men are being systematically emasculated in America today...

#1 The labor participation rate for men has been steadily declining over the years...
In the 1950s, nearly every man in his prime working years was in the labor force, a category that includes both those who are employed and those actively applying for jobs. The "participation rate" for men ages 25 to 54 stood at 97.7% in early 1956, but drifted downward to a post-war record low of 88.4% at the end of 2012.  (It ticked up very slightly at the start of this year to 88.6%.)
So where have all the men workers gone?
Some went into prison. Others are on disability. And still others can't find jobs and have simply given up looking.
#2 Back in 1950, more than 80 percent of all men in the United States had jobs.  Today, less than 65 percent of all men in the United States have jobs.  The chart posted below illustrates this stunning decline...
Men - Employment-Population Ratio
#3 During the last recession, men lost twice as many jobs as women did.

#4 According to Time Magazine, unemployed men are significantly more likely to get divorced than employed men are.

#5 According to the Economic Policy Institute, the "real entry-level hourly wage for men who recently graduated from high school" has declined from $15.64 in 1979 to $11.68 today.

#6 Between 1969 and 2009 the median wages earned by American men between the ages of 30 and 50 dropped by 27 percent after you account for inflation.

#7 Thanks to government policies which are killing off small businesses in America, the percentage of self-employed Americans is at an all-time low today.  This has had a disproportionate impact on men.

#8 In 1982, 1.9 percent of all men were receiving disability benefits.  Today, 3.1 percent of all men are receiving disability benefits.

#9 According to one very surprising study, "young, urban, childless women" make more money in America today than young, urban, childless men do.

#10 More than half of all middle management jobs in America are now held by women.

#11 More than half of all health care jobs in America are now held by women.

#12 The United States has the highest incarceration rate on the entire globe by a very wide margin.  Overall, the U.S. has approximately 25 percent of the entire global prison population even though it only has 5 percent of the total global population.  Men make up the vast majority of those that we are holding in our prisons.

#13 Incarceration rates for men in America have been steadily increasing over time.  The following is from a recent CNN article...
Looking at those born just after World War II, some 1.2% of white men and 9% of black men had been to prison by 2004, according to Bruce Western, a Harvard sociology professor. But looking at those born 30 years later, some 3.3% of white men and 20.7% of black men had been to prison.
#14 According to the Pew Research Center, only 51 percent of all American adults are currently married.  Back in 1960, 72 percent of all adults in the United States were married.

#15 Males account for approximately 70 percent of all Ds and Fs in U.S. public schools.

#16 About two-thirds of all students in "special education programs" are boys.

#17 The average American girl spends 5 hours a week playing video games.  The average American boy spends 13 hours a week playing video games.

#18 The average young American will spend 10,000 hours playing video games before the age of 21.

#19 One study discovered that 88 percent of all Americans between the ages of 8 and 18 play video games, and that video game addiction is approximately four times as common among boys as it is among girls.

#20 In 2011, SAT scores for young men were the worst that they had been in 40 years.

#21 According to the New York Times, approximately 57 percent of all young people enrolled at U.S. colleges are women.  That means that only 43 percent are men.

#22 It is being projected that women will earn 60 percent of all Bachelor's degrees from U.S. universities by the year 2016.

#23 Once in college, women are much more likely to complete their education and get a degree...
Women born in 1975 were roughly 17% more likely than their male counterparts to attend college and nearly 23% more likely to complete a four-year degree, according to data in Wayward Sons.
#24 Young men are nearly twice as likely to live with their parents as young women the same age are.

#25 Back in 1950, 78 percent of all households in the United States contained a married couple.  Today, that number has declined to 48 percent.

#26 The marriage rate in the United States has fallen to an all-time low.  Right now it is sitting at a yearly rate of 6.8 marriages per 1000 people.

#27 Today, an all-time low 44.2 percent of Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 are married.

#28 The U.S. family is rapidly breaking down.  100 years ago, 4.52 were living in the average U.S. household, but now the average U.S. household only consists of 2.59 people.

#29 At this point, approximately one out of every three children in America lives in a home without a father.

#30 The United States produces more pornography than any other nation in the world.  Men consume far more of that pornography than women do.

#31 An astounding 30 percent of all Internet traffic now goes to pornography websites, and one survey found that 25 percent of all employees that have Internet access visit sex websites while they are at work.

#32 In the United States today, political correctness reigns, and any reference to the male gender is being stamped out of our language.  For example, all over the country the term "manhole" is being replaced with the terms "utility hole" or "maintenance hole".

So what do you think?
Do you believe that men are being systematically emasculated in America today?

Please share this.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

TWA Flight 800: Another Government Cover-Up Exposed?

A new documentary about the deadly Trans World Airline Flight 800 featuring interviews with former investigators claims that the official explanation given for the ill-fated flight is wrong.
The flight crashed off the coast of Long Island in 1996, killing all 230 people on board in what is the third-deadliest aviation accident in U.S. history.
The official explanation given by the National Transportation Safety Board was that the crash was caused by a gas tank explosion, but the documentary gives 'solid proof' there was an external detonation, its co-producer said.
Many eye-witnesses claimed they had seen a streak of fire heading towards the plane before it crashed. Theories have suggested it was a missile strike from a terrorist or U.S. Navy vessel, and that the incident was subject to a government cover-up.
Scroll down for video
The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York, reassembled from recovered wreckage
The remains of the TWA Flight 800 from New York to Paris that exploded off Long Island, New York, reassembled from recovered wreckage
But now the producers of TWA FLIGHT 800, which premieres on July 17, the anniversary of the crash, on cable network EPIX, said they have more than just eye-witness statements to call on.
'Of course, everyone knows about the eyewitness statements, but we also have corroborating information from the radar data, and the radar data shows a(n) asymmetric explosion coming out of that plane - something that didn't happen in the official theory,' Tom Stalcup told CNN's New Day.
He said many witnesses said that there was an external force and 'there's no evidence' of the explosion in the center wing tank. He added that none of the witnesses had been allowed to testify.
The producers have now submitted a petition signed by former investigators calling for the NTSB  to reopen its investigation, based on the new evidence, Stalcup told CNN.
Among the whistle-blowers who worked on the investigation are Hank Hughes, a senior accident investigator, Bob Young, a TWA investigator, and Jim Speer, an accident investigator for the Airline Pilots Association.
Speaking out: Investigators who worked on the plane following the crash and co-producer Tom Stalcup, said there was no evidence that the explosion came from the wing tank
Speaking out: Investigators who worked on the plane following the crash and co-producer Tom Stalcup, said there was no evidence that the explosion came from the wing tank
TWA Flight 800 damaged seats
TWA Flight 800 damaged seats.
Firetrap: Images from the documentary show damaged seats on the plane, aboard which 230 people died


  • TWA Fight 800 exploded in mid-air off the coast of Long Island, NY on July 17, 1996 - just 12 minutes after it took off for Paris
  • All 230 people on board died, making it the third highest death toll from an aviation accident in U.S. territory in history
  • Victims' death certificates have not been finalized because 'manner of death'
    remains unknown
  • During the investigation, the FBI took over the case because a criminal act was suspected
  • Eyewitnesses reported seeing something go up quickly from the earth's surface right before the explosion
  • Unexplained explosive residue was found throughout the wreckage
  • Investigation concluded that the crash was probably caused by an electrical short circuit that ignited fuel vapors in the jet's center wing fuel tank
  • But the case is 'pending inactive' rather than closed
'We weren’t allowed to talk about the TWA 800 investigation when we were inside,' Young said. 'We had to retire first. That took a while.
'What [witnesses] told us doesn’t fit the mechanical failure scenario that was presented to the public at the end of our investigation.'
'The very next day [after the crash], the FBI came to speak to me and said, "you did not see that, you saw nothing",' one investigator said.
The documentary features interviews with these key members of the original investigation team, who now claim that their investigation was systematically undermined.
'This team of investigators who actually handled the wreckage and victims' bodies, prove that the officially proposed fuel-air explosion did not cause the crash,' said the film's producers.
'They also provide radar and forensic evidence proving that one or more ordinance explosions outside the aircraft caused the crash.'
The whistleblower team claim that at the time they were placed under a gag order by the NTSB, which they charged falsified the official conclusion of the cause of the crash, reports Fox News.

However, the statement said they did not speculate about the source or sources of any ordinance explosions.
The deadly crash occurred just 12 minutes after take-off from JFK International Airport on the flight bound for Paris, France.
Skeptic: Jim Speer inspecting damage
A part of a wing from TWA Flight 800
Skeptic: Jim Speer, an accident investigator for the Airline Pilots Association who appears in the documentary, inspects damage after the crash. Right, part of the plane's wing is seen in the water off New York
Many conspiracy theories exist, the most common is that a missile strike from a terrorist or U.S. Navy vessel caused the crash, and that it was subject to a government cover-up
Many conspiracy theories exist, the most common is that a missile strike from a terrorist or U.S. Navy vessel caused the crash, and that it was subject to a government cover-up

More than 600 people gave eye-witness accounts after seeing the plane crash and the majority described seeing a ‘rising streak of light’ moments before the crash' which many believed was a missile hitting the plane.
Many witnesses to the accident had seen a 'streak of light' that was usually described as ascending, moving to a point where a large fireball appeared, with several witnesses reporting that the fireball split in two as it descended toward the water.

There was intense public interest in these witness reports and much speculation that the reported streak of light was a missile that had struck TWA 800, causing the airplane to explode.
These witness accounts were a major reason for the initiation and duration of the FBI's criminal investigation.
'Revelations': The documentary, TWA FLIGHT 800, premieres on July 17 at 8PM ET on cable network EPIX
Tragedy: An image shows the reconstructed section of the plane. Although 90 percent of the aircraft was recovered, only the section around the central fuel tank was reconstructed
Tragedy: An image shows the reconstructed section of the plane. Although 90 percent of the aircraft was recovered, only the section around the central fuel tank was reconstructed
Approximately 80 FBI agents conducted interviews with potential witnesses daily. They conducted a 16-month investigation and concluded that there was no evidence to indicate that any criminal act occurred.
The NTSB told CNN that it was aware of the documentary and that the producers intend to file a petition to reopen the investigation.
'As required by NTSB regulation, a petition for reconsideration of board findings ... must be based on the discovery of NEW evidence or on a showing that the board's findings are erroneous,' NTSB spokeswoman Kelly Nantel said in a statement.
The documentary - TWA FLIGHT 800 – premieres on July 17, the anniversary of the crash, at 8PM ET on cable network EPIX.

Please share this.

Many Of The Largest Charities In America Are Giant Money Making Scams

Money - Photo by Serge Melki
How would you feel if you donated money to help disaster victims or cancer patients and you later found out that more than 97 percent of the money that you gave never got into the hands of the people that needed it?  Sadly, that is happening all over America today.  In fact, in some of the worst cases, less than a penny of every dollar that is donated ends up in the hands of those that need the help.  If you can believe it, right now there are 6,000 charities in the United States that use for-profit companies to raise money for them, and in many of those instances the for-profit companies end up keeping more than 50 percent of the donations for themselves.  In addition, many charities end up paying their employees “salaries” that are far greater than the total amount of money that the charities actually give to the needy.  The Tampa Bay Times, CNN and the Center for Investigative Reporting recently teamed up to conduct an investigation, and they came up with a list of the 50 worst charities in America.  They discovered that those charities raised more than $1.3 billion over the past ten years combined, but that nearly $1 billion of that total went to the for-profit companies that raise their donations for them.  The American people are being scammed out of an enormous amount of money, and people need to learn the truth about this.
According to the report that was put out, the “Kids Wish Network” is the absolute worst charity in America.  The following is how the Tampa Bay Times describes them…
The worst charity in America operates from a metal warehouse behind a gas station in Holiday.
Every year, Kids Wish Network raises millions of dollars in donations in the name of dying children and their families.
Every year, it spends less than 3 cents on the dollar helping kids.
Most of the rest gets diverted to enrich the charity’s operators and the for-profit companies Kids Wish hires to drum up donations.
In the past decade alone, Kids Wish has channeled nearly $110 million donated for sick children to its corporate solicitors. An additional $4.8 million has gone to pay the charity’s founder and his own consulting firms.
110 million dollars is a colossal amount of money.
Imagine how much good that could have done if it had actually gone to sick kids.
Instead, it went to enrich scammers that own shady companies that run pushy telemarketing operations.
Apparently “charity work” has become one of the most prominent “get rich quick” schemes in America.  The following is how CNN summarized some of the most important findings of the investigation…
– The 50 worst charities in America devote less than 4% of donations raised to direct cash aid. Some charities gave even less. Over a decade, one diabetes charity raised nearly $14 million and gave about $10,000 to patients. Six spent no cash at all on their cause.
– Even as they plead for financial support, operators at many of the 50 worst charities have lied to donors about where their money goes, taken multiple salaries, secretly paid themselves consulting fees or arranged fund-raising contracts with friends. One cancer charity paid a company owned by the president’s son nearly $18 million over eight years to solicit funds. A medical charity paid its biggest research grant to its president’s own for-profit company.
– Some nonprofits are little more than fronts for fund-raising companies, which bankroll their startup costs, lock them into exclusive contracts at exorbitant rates and even drive the charities into debt. Florida-based Project Cure has raised more than $65 million since 1998, but every year has wound up owing its fundraiser more than what was raised. According to its latest financial filing, the nonprofit is $3 million in debt.
– To disguise the meager amount of money that reaches those in need, charities use accounting tricks and inflate the value of donated dollar-store cast-offs – snack cakes and air fresheners – that they give to dying cancer patients and homeless veterans.
When you get a call at dinner time asking for money for sick children or to help support your local police, there is a good chance that call is coming from a “boiler room” that is being staffed by whatever shady characters that particular for-profit telemarketing firm was able to hire.  If you give them money, there is a very good chance that most of the money will be kept by the telemarketers.
And you never know who is on the other end of that telephone.  According to the Center for Investigative Reporting, it is often convicted felons that are taking down the credit card numbers of people that think that they are donating money to a good cause…
These charity-run boiler rooms are tucked behind unmarked doors in low-rent, mostly vacant strip centers. During a visit to one earlier this year, reporters saw about 20 men sitting at long tables, hunched over computers and wearing headsets. Working to raise enough money to hit bonus levels scrawled out on a whiteboard, they asked donors to give to help the families of officers killed in the line of duty.
Police Protective Fund’s Florida operations were ignored by state regulators until 2010.
That year, a local sheriff’s office fielded a complaint and raided one of the charity’s phone rooms in Port Richey.
According to the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office report, deputies found that 11 of the 27 employees who were calling for donations and taking down credit card numbers were convicted felons.
According to the investigation mentioned above, the following are the ten worst charities in America and the percentage of money that is donated to those organizations that actually goes to help people…
1. Kids Wish Network (2.5%)
2. Cancer Fund of America (0.9%)
3. Children’s Wish Foundation International (10.8%)
4. American Breast Cancer Foundation (5.3%)
5. Firefighters Charitable Foundation (8.4%)
6. Breast Cancer Relief Foundation (2.2%)
7. International Union of Police Associations (0.5%)
8. National Veterans Service Fund (7.8%)
9. American Association of State Troopers (8.6%)
10. Children’s Cancer Fund of America (5.3%)
The number two charity on the list, the Cancer Fund of America, deserves particular attention.  Over the past ten years, the Cancer Fund of America has raised nearly 100 million dollars.  Most of the donors probably assumed that most of the money would go to fund cancer research or to help cancer patients.  Unfortunately, that was not the case at all
In the past three years alone, Cancer Fund and its associated charities raised $110 million. The charities paid more than $75 million of that to solicitors. Cancer Fund ranks second on the Times/CIR list of America’s worst charities. (Florida’s Kids Wish Network placed first.)
Salaries in 2011 topped $8 million — 13 times more than patients received in cash. Nearly $1 million went to Reynolds family members.
The network’s programs are overstated at best. Some have been fabricated.
“Urgent pain medication” supposedly provided to critically ill cancer patients amounted to nothing more than over-the-counter ibuprofen, regulators determined. A program to drive patients to chemotherapy, touted by the charity in mailings, didn’t even exist.
One Reynolds family charity, Breast Cancer Society, told the IRS it shipped $36 million worth of medical supplies overseas in 2011. But the two companies named as suppliers of the donated goods said they have no record of dealing with the group.
Over the past 20 years, Cancer Fund has run afoul of regulators in at least six states, paying more than $525,000 to settle charges that include lying to donors. It hasn’t slowed the network.
The fines amount to about one-third of one percent of the $177 million raised by Cancer Fund of America over the same period.
Ultimately, less than one percent of the money raised by the Cancer Fund of America goes to help cancer patients…
Cancer Fund’s tally over the past decade: Family members nearly $5 million. Cancer patients $890,000.
The biggest winners were the fundraising companies. They earned more than 80 cents of every dollar donated for a total of $80.4 million.
Does that make you sick?
It should.
Of course there are many really good charities out there.  Hopefully this information will not keep people from donating to them.
But don’t just donate to anyone without carefully investigating them first, and definitely do not donate money over the phone.
Hopefully if enough people stop donating money over the phone it will start putting many of these telemarketers out of business, and that will be a great thing for all of us.
About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth.  His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on
Please share this.

Monday, June 17, 2013

77% Do Not Trust Television News

The annual Gallup survey revealing confidence in institutions made news earlier this week for a record low score of 10% for Congress. But another figure is noteworthy in the study: only 23% of those polled said they had a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in Television News.

One would think that 77% lacking trust in television news is a staggering number. Yet it is actually an improvement over last year's results of 79% (or 21% with confidence).

If the new low for Congress has something to do with recent political scandals, perhaps the media's coverage of those scandals has given them a slight boost.  However, other polls show trust in media to be even worse.

Another survey from earlier this year by Rasmussen concluded that only 6% rate news media as "very trustworthy" with twice as many (12%) who believe the news is "Not At All Trustworthy".

These surveys seem to contribute to the increasing trend of people turning to the Internet for their news. Pew Research's State of the Media study for 2013 showed that online news is the only growing sector in the news industry.

Although it's difficult to prove that getting news from the Internet translates into an increase alternative views, some indications are that this is the case.

A survey conducted last month in Australia showed that 50% of Australians who oppose vaccination got their information from the Internet, while only 17% of people who support vaccination got their information online.

This would seem to suggest that when people are exposed to alternative information and more in-depth reporting they will change their views.
Please share this.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Yahoo FOUGHT against NSA's warrantless spying program but lost and was forced by secret court to join PRISM

Yahoo's top lawyers had a courtroom showdown with the National Security Agency after it had demanded information on certain foreign users without a warrant, but the tech giant lost and was forced to hand over the data, it was revealed today.
Court documents obtained by the New York Times show that the Internet company had initially refused to join the PRISM spying program, insisting that the broad national security requests seeking users' personal information were unconstitutional.
However, the secret court operating under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) sided with the NSA and forced Yahoo's hand.
Secret battle: Court documents show that Yahoo challenged NSA's broad requests seeking its users' personal information, but the secret FISA court ruled against the tech giant
Secret battle: Court documents show that Yahoo challenged NSA's broad requests seeking its users' personal information, but the secret FISA court ruled against the tech giant
Information about Yahoo's legal battle against the NSA first emerged in a heavily redacted court order, but the name of the company involved had not been released until now.  
It was claimed that besides Yahoo, a number of major Silicon Valley companies became part of PRISM, among them Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, YouTube, Skype, AOL and the lesser known Internet company PalTalk, which has hosted a lot of traffic during the Arab Spring and the on-going Syrian civil war.
However, only Facebook and Google have been shown to have worked toward creating 'online rooms' in which to share data with the government.
Information about the classified program was leaked last week by NSA systems administrator Edward Snowden, 29, who smuggled the files concerning PRISM on a thumb drive.
Constitutional argument: In 2008, Yahoo lawyers challenged NSA's warrantless information requests, claiming that they violated their users' Fourth Amendment rights, but the company was eventually forced to join the top-secret PRISM program
Constitutional argument: In 2008, Yahoo lawyers challenged NSA's warrantless information requests, claiming that they violated their users' Fourth Amendment rights, but the company was eventually forced to join the top-secret PRISM program
In 2008, Yahoo argued that NSA's requests seeking to obtain its users' private data violated their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, but the judges on the FISA court disagreed with the company's assessment, calling their concerns 'overblown,' the Times reported.
'Notwithstanding the parade of horrible trotted out by the petitioner, it has presented no evidence of any actual harm, any egregious risk of error, or any broad potential for abuse,' the court said, adding that the government’s 'efforts to protect national security should not be frustrated by the courts.'
Yahoo's defeat in court reportedly left other top players in the industry more reluctant to challenge the NSA on surveillance request.
Classified: The particulars of the PRISM data-mining program have been outlined in a top-secret PowerPoint presentation for senior intelligence analysts, which ended up being leaked
Classified: The particulars of the PRISM data-mining program have been outlined in a top-secret PowerPoint presentation for senior intelligence analysts, which ended up being leaked

Participants: This graph shows when each of the nine tech companies joined PRISM, with Apple being the latest addition in October 2012
Participants: This graph shows when each of the nine tech companies joined PRISM, with Apple being the latest addition in October 2012
So far, Yahoo, Google and Facebook have all denied their involvement in PRISM.
'Yahoo! has not joined any program in which we volunteer to share user data with the U.S. government,' Yahoo General Counsel Ron Bell wrote in a Tumblr post Saturday. 'We do not voluntarily disclose user information. The only disclosures that occur are in response to specific demands.'
In the wake of the unwarranted spying scandal, a number of top Silicon Valley companies, among them Facebook, Google and Microsoft, have asked the government to overturn a gag order allowing them to publicly disclose national security requests.
Bombshell: NSA and FBI have been extracting audio, video, photos, e-mails, documents and other data from Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, YouTube, Skype, AOL and PalTalk
Bombshell: NSA and FBI have been extracting audio, video, photos, e-mails, documents and other data from Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, YouTube, Skype, AOL and PalTalk

Key source: PRISM has been described by NSA officials 'as the most prolific contributor to the president's Daily Brief,' providing analysts with a wealth of 'raw material'
Key source: PRISM has been described by NSA officials 'as the most prolific contributor to the president's Daily Brief,' providing analysts with a wealth of 'raw material'
Google Inc was the first to go public with its demand for greater transparency, releasing an open letter asking the U.S. Department of Justice for permission to disclose the number and scope of data requests each receives from security agencies, including confidential FISA requests.
Microsoft Corp and Facebook Inc soon followed with similarly worded statements in support of Google.
Last year, the government issued more than 1,850 FISA requests and 15,000 National Security Letters, which refers to requests filed by the FBI to collect information about Americans.
Between 2008 and last year, only two of more than 8,500 FISA requests were rejected by the secret court, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit research group.
Storage space: NSA's Utah Data Center in Bluffdale, Utah, where government records of citizen's phone and internet usage could be kept
Storage space: NSA's Utah Data Center in Bluffdale, Utah, where government records of citizen's phone and internet usage could be kept

Please share this.

A View From Space with Gary Bell the Spaceman, June 15, 2013

TOPICS:  Sirius A, Sirius B, Dogstar, Dogon Religion, Shugborough Statue, 22nd July, Rennes-le-Ch√Ęteau.....

Please share this.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Political Trivia Test – Can You Pass It?

A little trivia to see how much history you know or wish to guess at.
If you don’t know the answer make your best guess.

Answer all the questions before looking at the answers at the bottom.

1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above

2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by
the few, and for the few…… And to replace it with shared responsibility
for shared prosperity.”
A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above

3) “(We) …..can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means
something has to be taken away from some people.”
A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above

4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give
up a little bit of their own … in order to create this common ground.”
A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above

5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.”
A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above

6) “I think it’s time to send a clear message to what has become the most
profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched.”
A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above

Scroll down for answers

Hillary ClintonHillary Clinton 2016

(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005

She’s Coming. Be afraid, Be very afraid!!

And these statements were said before she hit her head!!!
Please share this.

A View From Space with Gary Bell the Spaceman, June 8, 2013



Please share this.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

How To Protect Your Online Privacy

Don't ask your government for your Privacy, take it back:
If you have any problems installing or using the above software, please contact the projects. They would love to get feedback and help you use their software.
Have no clue what Cryptography is or why you should care? Checkout the Crypto Party Handbook or the EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense Project.
Just want some simple tips? Checkout EFF's Top 12 Ways to Protect Your Online Privacy.

Please share this.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Hotel Breaks Discrimination Law on Orders of Bilderberg

Paul Joseph Watson
June 1, 2013
The Bilderberg Group ordered a hotel at which journalists from Infowars were set to stay to cover the organization’s secretive confab next week to cancel the reservations in an unprecedented attempt to block freedom of the press.
Alex Jones and his reporters all received phone calls from the Grove Hotel in Watford, England today informing them that their reservations – which ran until the day before Bilderberg are set to meet in the same location – had been cancelled.

The manager of the hotel informed us that due to “consultations with the security services” in preparation for a big conference taking place next week, all the rooms had been cancelled.

When asked if Jones and his crew were considered a “security risk,” the hotel manager responded “I’m not implying that,” suggesting that the rooms were cancelled simply because Bilderberg ordered the Grove to do so.

To be clear, Infowars reporters had not attempted to book rooms during the Bilderberg conference, this was days before the Bilderberg conference, and yet the rooms were still cancelled.

The Grove’s action in discriminating against individuals for their political beliefs is a violation of the 2010 Equality Act. Previous cases under the same law brought by those discriminated against by guest houses due to their sexuality have been successful. A 2012 European Court of Human Rights judgement affirms the fact that discrimination against an individual due to their political beliefs is unlawful under the Equality Act.

The security operation surrounding Bilderberg – a huge chunk of which is being paid for by taxpayers to the tune of millions of pounds – is so paranoid that it doesn’t want reporters anywhere near the sprawling luxury Grove estate days before a single Bilderberg member even arrives.

This is yet another damning indictment of how Bilderberg is comprised of authoritarian control freaks who despise transparency and freedom of the press, to the extent that they now exert power over private businesses like the Grove in order to cause problems for members of the media.

All this coincided with a hack attack on, which has been under sustained attack over the last 12 hours.

Infowars had already arranged back-up hotels in the event of the rooms being cancelled and will still cover the event, undeterred by the intimidation tactics being deployed against us.

Such tactics mirror what happened to Alex Jones and his reporters last year when they were kicked out of the Marriott Hotel in Chantilly days before the Bilderberg meeting. Police even then tried to get Jones and his crew kicked out from other nearby hotels.

The Bilderberg Group has once again wielded its power in a way that will only backfire in that it will draw more attention to their authoritarian agenda. Thousands of people will descend on the site of the meeting in the spirit of freedom and there’s nothing Bilderberg can do about it.

Infowars is now calling on concerned citizens from all over the United Kingdom and Europe to rally to the cause and communicate the message to Bilderberg that they cannot crush the right to free speech, freedom of the press, and the right to demonstrate.

Alex Jones has a recording of the phone call he received from the hotel and this will be added to the article shortly.

Please share this.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

A View From Space with Gary Bell the Spaceman, June 1, 2013

TOPICS:  Asteroids, Meteorites, Issac Newton, Edmond Halley, Royalty, Illuminati, N.W.O., Numerology, Stars, Aliens, WW3.


Please share this.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

The 25 Rules of Disinformation

From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog.
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
Please share this.