A viral anti-feminist video which showed men defending themselves against violent assaults by women was controversially deleted after YouTube deemed the video to be a form of “hate speech”.
Uploaded by a YouTube user called RedPillPhilosophy, the
video received over 1.1 million views and over 9,000 likes on YouTube
alone before it was taken down.
The clip showed numerous instances of women attacking
men and men defending themselves in an effort to make the point that
feminists don’t truly believe in “gender equality”.
“All the video ever did was document people defending
themselves against bullies, aggressors (and) violent people,” commented
the uploader, noting that the idea we live in a “patriarchy” is
discredited if men defending themselves against violence was considered
to be “hate speech”.
“Apparently we live in a society where a woman who
is bullying somebody should get a free pass,” he added, noting that a
video showing women defending themselves against men would have been
celebrated.
The incident also illustrates how YouTube’s policy
on deleting videos is driven by mob rule. So long as enough individuals
can be encouraged to flag a video, it is automatically censored no
matter the nature of its content.
While the original video was undoubtedly
controversial and offensive to many, the fact that it was completely
removed once again highlights how censorious feminists hold sway over
the policing of thought and content on the Internet. Videos of women
attacking men remain on YouTube and are not considered to be “hate
speech.”
This is by no means the first time that radical
feminists have organized to have content which challenges their views
censored. Janet Bloomfield, the founder of the #WomenAgainstFeminism
hashtag, had her Twitter account erased
after she disagreed with feminist Jessica Valenti. The Guardian writer
claimed that Christmas was oppressive to women because of the chores
they were expected to do during the holiday season.
Watch the original video that was deleted here and decide for yourself whether it represents “hate speech”.
Please share this.
No comments:
Post a Comment