She denies she was close to the Communist rulers in East Germany, where she grew up.
So this 1972 photo of her in military-style uniform has left German Chancellor Angela Merkel ‘not amused’.
Then called Angela Kasner and aged 17, she is shown happily involved in a civil defence exercise under the gaze of an East German officer.
Drills included first aid and preparing for nuclear attack.
Mrs Merkel (circled) who was 17-year-old Angela Kasner when the picture was taken in 1972, is shown in fatigues marching with a group of friends and an East German officer
A member of Italy's metalworkers union walks by a banner with a picture of German Chancellor Angela Merkel during a demonstration in Rome. The unrest came as Mrs Merkel tried to dampen speculation over her links with East German communists
All children had to take part if they wanted to go to university, but Mrs Merkel is also alleged to have been a propaganda secretary for the youth movement, the FDJ.
The photo was found by an old schoolfriend, Sonja Felssberg, 58, and handed to a German newspaper.
Her smile is easily recognisable and her forage cap is set at a jaunty angle as she strides along at the High School Hermann Matern in Templin, where she was brought up behind the iron curtain.
Not even illness or a death in the family allowed for the youngsters to skip the martial lessons - they were simply postponed but had to be completed.
Sonja Felssberg, now 58 and an old school comrade, found the photo and handed it to a national German newspaper.
Mrs Merkel will hope the row doesn't undermine her bid for a third term in office
It was published as Mrs Merkel, who was the subject of austerity protests in Italy at the weekend, tried to play down allegations in a new book that she was much closer to the Communist rulers of the lost Socialist state than she previously admitted to, including holding a post as a propaganda secretary in the youth movement the FDJ.
Mrs. Felssberg said: 'We all had to sleep ten to a room in bunk beds when we did the exercises. In the day we learned things like treating wounds and stabilising patients - not much different from what you would learn today in first aid training with the Red Cross.
'But we also had to march and learn to use maps and a compass for hikes in the woods and wilderness. It was long ago but I remember it very well - and Angela.'
Mrs. Merkel is aiming for a third bid in office in the autumn.
She is hoping that the rumours about her alleged closeness to the politburo of East Germany will not diminish her chances.
But the photo of the old days has reportedly upset her.
One of her aides said: 'Madam Chancellor is not amused'
There is a prophecy of St. Francis of Assisi in an authentic and renowned
source, in which he speaks of the appearance of an apostatic antipope in the
time of tribulation (“futurae tribulationis”).[1]
It says “that someone who is not canonically elected and is infected with
heretical wickedness, at the turning point of that tribulation raised to the
papacy, would make a refined effort to give many the death of his error to
drink” (“quod aliquis, non canonice electus et haeretica pravitate
infectus, in articulo tribulationis illius ad papatum assumptus, multis
mortem sui erroris sagaciter propinare moliretur”).[2] St. Francis of
Assisi predicted that this figure “tyrannically usurps the papacy” (“papatum
usurpare tyrannice”).[3]
It is in this sense that in our time St. Padre Pio has entrusted to his
spiritual son, the famous exorcist Don Gabriele Amorth, the following
dramatic words: “It is satan who has entered the womb of the Church, and
within a short while, he will rule over a false church.”[4]
St. Padre Pio knew the Third Secret of Fatima — it had actually been
revealed to him four years before the little shepherds.[5]
The well-known Spanish journalist José María Zavala asked Don Gabriele
Amorth about it in more detail, and summarized the conclusion of the dialog
as follows: “There were two recurring and interrelated themes: the great
apostasy in the Church from its apex — in accordance with the testimony of
Cardinal Ciappi — and the introduction of the devil to the head of the
Church by means of a pope under the control of satan.”[6]
In this context, Zavala referred to the exact correspondence of these
words to the statement of Frère Michel, a great expert on the message of
Fatima and author of a trilogy on the subject. He stated: “It will be the
time of the decisive battle between the Virgin and the devil. A flood of
diabolical confusion will spread throughout the world. Satan will penetrate
the highest levels of the Church. This will be the great apostasy announced
for the last days, […] the ‘false prophet’ who betrays the Church in favor
of the ‘beast,’ according to the prophecy of the Apocalypse.”[7]
In fact, as Sr. Lucia herself pointed out[8], the secret is revealed in
the last book of Holy Scripture.
In that book, there is talk of the fiery red dragon (cf. Apoc 12:3),
which is manifest in atheistic communism, and of the black beast (cf. Apoc
13:1-2), which represents freemasonry.
Then it says: “Another beast came up out of the earth. It had two horns
like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon. It exercised all the power of the
first beast before its eyes. It made the earth and its inhabitants worship
the first beast” (Apoc 13:11-12).
The beast, which looks like a lamb, represents the ecclesiastical
freemasonry that has penetrated into the interior of the temple — especially
into the hierarchy. Its goal is to overcome the Catholic Church from within.
It wants and achieves for a short time the creation of an idol — a false
christ and a false church.[9]
The reference to the hierarchy of the Church is crucial, in which the
mitre — with two horns — indicates the fullness of the priesthood. The beast
that comes up out of the earth looks like a servant of Christ, the Lamb, but
is a servant of satan, the dragon.
Thus, if the second beast is ecclesiastical freemasonry, it is
personified and literally elevated to the summit in the false prophet at its
head[10], who is expressly designated as such in three passages of the
Apocalypse (Apoc 16:13; 19:20; 20:10).
He is the pseudo-religious leader of the anti-church. Through grave
heresies and despicable sacrileges he advances the great apostasy from the
top. He deceives and cheats the inhabitants of the earth (cf. Apoc 13:14)
and wants to lead people to worship the antichrist, whose direct forerunner
he is (cf. Apoc 13:12).
The former Bishop of Fulda, the exegete of the New Testament Prof. Dr.
Dr. Eduard Schick, has also pointed out this dimension in his work on the
Apocalypse: “The second beast’s mission is the unlimited seizure of power by
the first; for this purpose it is ordered and equipped by the first; it is
to lead people to recognize the first as what it claims to be, namely God
himself. All his propaganda aims at this in words and deeds […] It is a
matter of religiously transfiguring the world power of the antichrist and
getting mankind to pay him cultic veneration in turn.”
Bishop Schick accordingly speaks of a satanic trinity. It consists of the
dragon and the two beasts.
The first beast, which represents freemasonry, is personified in the
antichrist, and the second, which represents ecclesiastical freemasonry, in
the false prophet.[12] Their goal is the unrestricted rule of the world, the
kingdom of the devil on earth.
“The rulers of the world, who had placed themselves in the service of the
‘satanic trinity,’ believe that the favorable opportunity has come to lead
together the final destructive strike against the Church of Christ on earth.
The satanic triad doubles its propaganda for this purpose.”[13]
Archbishop Dr. Dr. Fulton J. Sheen made it clear in this context that
this agenda is marked by the establishment of a counter-church: “It will
have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and
emptied of its divine content. There will be a mystical body of the
antichrist, which will resemble in all its externals the Mystical Body of
Christ.”[14] Accordingly, an anti-church at its head necessarily needs an
anti-pope, who is the false prophet of the Apocalypse.
The hostile aspiration wants to seduce people to “accept a new religion
without the cross, a liturgy without the hereafter, a religion to destroy
religion, or a politics that is a religion.”[15]
Blessed Anna Katharina Emmerich, the great German mystic, has seen and
described the rise of the pernicious anti-church. She “saw how […] another
dark church arose in Rome.”[16] In doing so, she used a drastic term that
clearly demonstrates the apocalyptic extent of the event: “But the whole
house was dark and black, and all that happened in it was darkness and gloom
[…] I also saw how very bad the consequences of this after-church would be.
I saw it grow, I saw many heretics of all ranks go to the city.”[17]
Blessed Anna Katharina Emmerich saw the closure of the churches and the
great distress of the Catholic communities everywhere.[18] She described the
spread of the “dark after-church” as an implementation of the antichristian
decisive struggle: “The sect receives its signature from the apocalyptic
beast which, risen from the sea, dwells with it and drives it to fight
against the flock of Christ.”[19]
Against the background of this apocalyptic period, the famous message of
La Salette echoes like a loud and insistent warning: “Rome will lose faith
and become the seat of the antichrist”[20].
November 30, 2020 St. Andrew, Apostle, brother of St. Peter Fr.
Frank Unterhalt
https://www.nielsenreport.org Dutch girl speaks out against modern day feminism and migration.
At a party conference of new Dutch political party Forum for Democracy, a young lady with the name Eva Vlaardingerbroek gave a surprisingly refreshing speech in which she spoke out against modern day feminism.
She stated that modern day feminism (also known as 3rd wave feminism) falls under the umbrella of cultural marxism.
This speech has been translated into English.
Roughly 18 months have passed since New York Magazine published a cover story
declaring that, in the age of President Trump, all the new "it" kids in
Brooklyn (we use the term "kids" loosely; most are well into their 30s)
are avowed socialists.
As the reporter explains, the new generation of Brooklyn cool kids
have blue check marks on twitter and low-paying editorial jobs at
digital magazines like the (now defunct) Outline, Deadspin (a media
outlet ostensibly dedicated to sports but realistically covered whatever
its reporters and editors felt like writing about on any given day) or
Jacobin, a magazine that has been described by some as "straight up
Marxist" in its editorial slant. Almost all of them were white women,
the most oppressed class.
One year later, a staff uprising at the NYT exposed just how deeply
embedded these new crypto-marxist values have become in the modern
American media environment. Staffers successfully ousted Opinion Page
editor James Bennett over his decision to curate an essay from Republican Sen. Tom Cotton
despite the fact that the opinion page is supposed to be an entirely
separate editorial entity from the NYT's newsgathering operation.
This week, the NYT has published a story about a handful of wealthy
heirs who have embraced the socialist credo, and who see their massive
piles of inherited wealth as a symbol of shame, not a blessing for which
they should be extremely grateful.
Take 25-year-old Sam Jacobs, for example. Described as "a socialist
since college", he reportedly sees his family's "'extreme plutocratic
wealth' as both a moral and economic failure".
"I want to build a world where someone like me, a young person who
controls tens of millions of dollars, is impossible," he said.
Fortunately for Jacobs, his grandfather was one of the founders of
Qualcomm, the ubiquitous chipmaker. And even if he gives $30 million
away, he'll still have another $70 million or so coming to him over the
course of his lifetime. And what's more, he's not alone. As the NYT
reports, for all their kvetching about student loans, American
millennials will soon become the beneficiaries of what social scientists
are calling "the great wealth transfer": tens of trillions of dollars
are expected to pass from the hands of baby boomers to their millennial
and Gen X spawn over the coming decade.
However, most American millennials won't inherit anything, except for
"debt, dim job prospects" and a "figment" of the social safety net
(that seems like an exaggeration, especially considering that literally
every single American citizen who reaches the required age will receive a
monthly check from the federal government, part of a program called
"social security", not to mention medicare/medicaid).
But as both a "trust-fund kid and an anticapitalist", Jacobs "is in a
rare position among leftists fighting against economic inequality". And
he's hardly along in trying to navigate "what it means to be with the
99%, when you're the 1%" - embracing the type of reductive, us-vs.-them
thinking promoted by Bernie Sanders and his allies.
30-year-old Rachel Gelman is another example. Her wealthy family gave
generously to liberal causes growing up. Now, as a 30-year-old
preparing to inherit millions from her parents, Gelman is trying to find
a way to give back since most of her family's money "comes from
stocks...which means it comes from underpaying and undervaluing
working-class people, and that’s impossible to disconnect from the
economic legacies of Indigenous genocide and slavery."
Of course, no story about modern day socialism would be complete
without a quote from professor Richard Wolff, an "economist" who
currently teaches at the New School in Manhattan (an overpriced
university dedicated to serving the overprivileged elite who could score
high enough on their SATs to get into NYU).
As Wolff, known to millions of millennials for his guest appearances
on the left wing podcast "Chapo Trap House", explains, all the money
being inherited by today's millennials came from "a mammoth
redistribution away from the working masses, creating a super-rich tiny
minority at the expense of a fleeting American dream."
Later on in the story, one of the heirs whose wealth comes from a
chain of strip malls, said the business model just reeks of
"intersectional oppression".
Heirs whose wealth has come from a specific source sometimes use that
history to guide their giving. Pierce Delahunt, a 32-year-old
"socialist, anarchist, Marxist, communist or all of the above," has a
trust fund that was financed by their former stepfather’s outlet mall
empire. (Mx. Delahunt takes nongendered pronouns.)
"When I think about outlet malls, I think about intersectional
oppression," Mx. Delahunt said. There’s the originally Indigenous land
each mall was built on, plus the low wages paid to retail and food
service workers, who are disproportionately people of color, and the
carbon emissions of manufacturing and transporting the goods. With that
on their mind, Mx. Delahunt gives away $10,000 a month, divided between
50 small organizations, most of which have an anticapitalist mission and
in some way tackle the externalities of discount shopping.
In reality, most of the wealth held by baby boomers wasn't
redistributed, but was in fact created during the 20th century during
the post-war economic boom - an economic movement that generated more
prosperity, and dragged more people out of poverty, than any earlier
period in human history.
PS I
predict a growing industry of setting up "charity" scams to swindle
these kids that are so ignorant they won't know they are getting
fleeced. Think how many people at least twice as smart as them get
scammed by Madoff and such.
Troll them in a chat room, invite them out to your poverty center
with a dozen accomplices playing the victim roles and schedule a monthly
distribution. Use the same setup with a different name to swindle
other hipster dufuses. Farm as many subsidies as they can.
The globalist
technocracy is using the COVID-19 pandemic to bypass democratic
accountability, override opposition, accelerate their agenda and to
impose it on the public against our will
The Great Reset
refers to a global agenda to monitor and control the world through
digital surveillance. You’ll be tied to it through an electronic ID
linked to your bank account and health records, and a social credit ID
that will end up dictating every facet of your life
The Great Reset
is about getting rid of capitalism and free enterprise, and replacing
them with technocracy, publicly referred to as “sustainable development”
and “stakeholder capitalism”
There’s not a
single area of life that is left out of this Great Reset plan. The
planned reform will affect everything from government, energy and
finance to food, medicine, real estate, policing and even how we
interact with our fellow human beings in general
Privacy
protections are a major hurdle in this plan, which is why every effort
is made to get people to loosen their views on the right for privacy. In
the U.S., we also have the Constitution that stands in the way, which
is why efforts to undermine, circumvent, ignore or nullify it are
increasing
What is this “Great Reset” we’re now
hearing about? In a nutshell, the Great Reset refers to a global agenda
to monitor and control the world through digital surveillance.
As explained by journalist James Corbett in his October 16, 2020, Corbett Report above,1
the Great Reset is a new “social contract” that ties every person to it
through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health
records, and a social credit ID that will end up dictating every facet
of your life.
It’s about getting rid of capitalism and free enterprise, and
replacing them with “sustainable development” and “stakeholder
capitalism” — terms that belie their nefarious, anti-humanity intents.
As noted in the book, “Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order”:2
“… Sustainable Development is Technocracy … The Sustainable
Development movement has taken careful steps to conceal its true
identity, strategy and purpose, but once the veil is lifted, you will
never see it any other way. Once its strategy is unmasked, everything
else will start to make sense.”
The Grand Plan
In her blog post “The Great Reset for Dummies,” Tessa Lena summarizes the purpose behind the call for a global “reset”:3
“The mathematical reason for the Great Reset is that thanks to
technology, the planet has gotten small, and the infinite expansion
economic model is bust — but obviously, the super wealthy want to
continue staying super wealthy, and so they need a miracle, another
bubble, plus a surgically precise system for managing what they
perceive as ‘their limited resources.’
Thus, they desperately want a bubble providing new growth out of
thin air — literally — while simultaneously they seek to tighten the
peasants’ belts, an effort that starts with ‘behavioral modification,’
a.k.a. resetting the western peasants’ sense of entitlement to high
life standards and liberties (see awful ‘privilege’).
The psychological reason for the Great Reset is the fear of
losing control of property, the planet. I suppose, if you own billions
and move trillions, your perception of reality gets funky, and
everything down below looks like an ant hill that exists for you. Just
ants and numbers, your assets. Thus, the practical aim of the Great
Reset is to fundamentally restructure the world’s economy and
geopolitical relations based on two assumptions:
One, that every element of nature and every life form is a part
of the global inventory (managed by the allegedly benevolent state,
which, in turn, is owned by several suddenly benevolent wealthy people,
via technology).
And two, that all inventory needs to be strictly accounted for:
be registered in a central database, be readable by a scanner and
easily ID’ed, and be managed by AI, using the latest ‘science.’
The goal is to count and then efficiently manage and control all
resources, including people, on an unprecedented scale, with
unprecedented digital … precision — all while the masters keep
indulging, enjoying vast patches of conserved nature, free of
unnecessary sovereign peasants and their unpredictability.”
Global Asset Reallocations Will Not Benefit ‘the People’
These new global “assets” can also be turned into brand new
financial instruments that can then be traded. An example of this was
given by Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., in my interview with her.
In it, she explained how India is headed toward Zero-Budget Natural Farming
— a brand-new concept of farming in which farmers must trade the
carbon rate in their soil on the global market if they want to make a
living. They’ll get no money at all for the crops they actually grow.
There’s not a single area of life that is left out of this Great
Reset plan. The planned reform will affect everything from government,
energy and finance to food, medicine, real estate, policing and even
how we interact with our fellow human beings in general.
Privacy protections, of course, are a major hurdle in this plan,
which is why every effort is made to get people to loosen their views
on the right for privacy. In the U.S., we also have the Constitution that stands in the way, which is why efforts to undermine, circumvent, ignore or nullify it are increasing.
“To sum it up, the desired end result is a giant, joyless,
highly controlled global conveyor of everything and everybody where
privacy is tremendously expensive, dissent is unthinkable, and spiritual
submission is mandatory.
It’s like a 24/7 medicated reality, except the medications are
both chemical and digital, and they are reporting you back to the
mothership, which can then punish you for bad behavior by, say,
blocking your access to certain places or by putting a hold on your
digital bank account — perhaps without any human intervention at all,” Lena writes.4
Stakeholder Capitalism
An October 5, 2020, Winter Oak article5
addressed the “technocratic fascist vision” of professor Klaus Schwab,
founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum who wrote
the book on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Schwab announced the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset Initiative in June 2020, which includes stripping all people of their privately owned assets.
In addition to being a staunch technocrat, Schwab also has a strong
transhumanist bend, and he has spoken of a near future in which humans
merge with machines and in which law enforcement will be able to read
our mind.6
Winter Oak — a British nonprofit social justice organization —
points out that Schwab and his globalist accomplices are using the
COVID-19 pandemic “to bypass democratic accountability, to override
opposition, to accelerate their agenda and to impose it on the rest of
humankind against our will.”
This is no conspiracy theory. The plan is out in the open. As noted by Time magazine,7
“The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to think
about the kind of future we want.” The same statement has been
delivered by a number of politicians and organizations around the world
in recent months.
Schwab’s book,8,9
“COVID-19: The Great Reset” also urges industry leaders and decision
makers to “make good use of the pandemic” and “not letting the crisis
go to waste.” Incidentally, the owner of Time magazine and founder of
Salesforce, Mark Benioff, is also a board member of the World Economic
Forum,10 so he’s clearly familiar with the reset plan.
The problem is that while the plan is being sold as a way to,
finally, make life fair and equitable for all people, the required
sacrifices do not apply to the technocrats running the system.
Ultimately, the Great Reset will result in two tiers or people: the
technocratic elite, who have all the power and rule over all assets,
and the rest of humanity, who have no power, no assets and no say-so in
anything.
While technocracy is not a political system but an economic one, in
practical terms it does resemble fascism. None of it is being sold
under the banner of fascism, of course. Instead, they use financial
terms like “stakeholder capitalism,” described by Forbes magazine11
as “the notion that a firm focuses on meeting the needs of all its
stakeholders: customers, employees, partners, the community and society
as a whole.”
In that same article, Forbes points out that this strategy has
already been tried and failed. It failed because balancing conflicting
stakeholder claims was near-impossible and only led to mass confusion
and poor returns. The failure of this strategy is what led big
businesses to focus on maximizing shareholder value instead.
Now, at a time when big business finds itself under attack for
“single-mindedly shoveling money to its shareholders and its executives
at the expense of customers, employees, the environment and society as
a whole,” the answer, they say, is to return to stakeholder
capitalism. But if it didn’t work before, what makes us think it will
work now?
Great Reset Plan for Big Food
A November 9, 2020, article12
in The Defender, a new media platform by the Children’s Health Defense,
also points out the problems with the World Economic Forum’s Great
Reset plan for the food industry:
“The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity,
hunger and disease, and even mitigate climate change. But a closer look
at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to
usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is
tighter corporate control over the food system by means of
technological solutions.”
Aside from the food industry, partners13
include data mining giants, telecommunications, weapons manufacturers,
finance, drug companies and the biotechnology industry.
Looking at that list, it should come as no surprise that the World
Economic Forum insists the future of food and public health hinges on
genetically modified organisms (GMOs), laboratory-grown protein, drugs
and industrial chemicals.
The EAT Forum and the Rise of Food Imperialism
To further the fake food takeover, the World Economic Forum has
partnered with the EAT Forum, which will set the political agenda for
global food production. The EAT Forum was cofounded by the Wellcome
Trust, which in turn was established with the financial help of
GlaxoSmithKline.
EAT currently collaborates with nearly 40 city governments across
Africa, Europe, Asia, North and South America and Australia, and
maintains close relationships with imitation meat companies such as
Impossible Foods, which was cofounded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill
Gates.14
As noted by The Defender, the ultimate aim is to “replace wholesome
nutritious foods with genetically modified lab creations.” To this end,
EAT is working with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to
establish global dietary guidelines and sustainable development
initiatives.
The “Planetary Health Diet”15
developed by EAT is a diet that is supposed to replace all others.
Federic Leroy, a food science and biotechnology professor at University
of Brussels told The Defender:16
“The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global
population by as much as 90% in some cases and replaces it with
lab-made foods, cereals and oil.”
Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., has raised harsh critique against the proposed
diet saying it “is not about nutrition at all. It’s about big business
and it’s about a corporate takeover of the food system.”17 The Defender adds:18
“According to EAT’s own reports, the big adjustments the
organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system
are ‘unlikely to be successful if left up to the individual,’ and the
changes they wish to impose on societal eating habits and food ‘require
reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that
include laws, fiscal measures, subsidies and penalties, trade
reconfiguration and other economic and structural measures.’
But Shiva said this is the wrong approach, because ‘all of the
science’ shows that diets should be centered around regional and
geographical biodiversity. She explained that ‘EAT’s uniform global
diet will be produced with western technology and agricultural
chemicals. Forcing this onto sovereign nations by multinational
lobbying is what I refer to as food imperialism.’”
The Future of Food and Health Care
You can get a feel for where the future of food is headed by analyzing the World Economic Forum’s strategic intelligence map.19
As you can see, this top-down approach ties food production to a wide
range of sectors, including biotech, the chemical industry, artificial
intelligence, the internet of things and the digital economy.
For more details on Schwab and the World Economic Forum’s strategic intelligence plan, see Covert Geopolitic’s article,20 “Breaking Down the Global Elite’s Great Reset Master Plan.”
If any of this raises your concern, you’re probably not going to
like what the World Health Economic Forum has in store for health care
reform either. As detailed on their website:21
“Our current capital intensive, hospital-centric model is
unsustainable and ineffective. The Platform for Shaping the Future of
Health and Healthcare leverages a data-enabled delivery system and
virtual care, integrated across the continuum of care from precision
prevention to personalized care delivery …”
Aiding the World Economic Forum in this health care transformation
are the biggest corporate criminals in the history of the modern world,
including Bill Gates, AstraZeneca,22Bayer,23 Johnson & Johnson,24 Merck,25 Pfizer,26 Novartis27 and a host of others.28
These companies have at various times been found guilty of all sorts
of crimes that they have paid tens of billions of dollars in fines
for. They are also loaded with conflicts of interest in nearly every
venture they are involved with. Yet we’re now supposed to believe these
companies are going to put aside their profit incentives and fix the
whole system?
Build Back Better
As noted in a July 21, 2020, World Economic Forum article,29
the economic devastation caused by COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns “has the
potential to hobble global prosperity for generations to come.” The
answer is to come up with stimulus measures, such as infrastructure
development, that can allow countries to move forward.
But while at it, countries are urged to make sure the economic
system is “built back better.” Make no mistake, this catchy slogan is
part and parcel of the Great Reset plan and cannot be separated from
it, no matter how altruistic it may sound. As reported by Fox News:30
“A radical movement called the Great Reset embraced by some
Democrats poses a grave threat to liberty and free markets in the
United States and around the world … The Great Reset is perhaps the
biggest danger to capitalism and individual rights since the collapse
of the Soviet Union …
It would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it
with progressive and modern socialist systems, with a special emphasis
placed on eco-socialist policies … Policy ideas offered by ‘Great Reset’
advocates include government-provided basic income programs, universal
health care, massive tax increases and the Green New Deal …
For example, at a campaign event on July 9, Biden said we need
to end the ‘era of shareholder capitalism,’ a major part of the Great
Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating
social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights …
The Build Back Better plan comes straight from the Great Reset’s
playbook … As recently as July 13, the World Economic Forum promoted
‘building back better’ through ‘green’ infrastructure programs as part
of the Great Reset …”
Part of the “building back better” is to shift the financial system
over to an all-digital currency system, which in turn is part of the
system of social control, as it can easily be used to incentivize
desired behaviors and discourage undesired ones.
An August 13, 2020, article31
on the Federal Reserve website discusses the supposed benefits of a
central bank digital currency (CBDC). There’s general agreement among
experts that most major countries will implement CBDC within the next
two to four years.
Many uninformed people believe that these new CBDCs will be very
similar to existing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, but they would be
mistaken. Bitcoin is decentralized and a rational strategy to opt out
of the existing central bank controlled system, while these CBDCs will
be centralized and completely controlled by the central banks and will
have smart contracts that allow the banks to surveil and control your
life.
The Great Reset Psyops Guide
It goes without saying that to achieve the kind of radical
transformation of every part of society has its challenges. No person
in their right mind would agree to it if aware of the details of the
whole plan. So, to roll this out, they had to use psychological
manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool there is.
As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin,
there’s an entire school of public health research that focuses on
identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into accepting
desired public health measures.
By adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix, you can bring an
individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which you can
no longer think logically — and in this state, you are more easily
manipulated. The following graphic illustrates the central role of
fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset.
Social Engineering Is Central to Technocratic Rule
In closing, keep in mind that technocracy is inherently a
technological society run through social engineering. Fear is but one
manipulation tool. The focus on “science” is another. Anytime someone
dissents, they’re simply accused of being “anti-science,” and any
science that conflicts with the status quo is declared “debunked
science.”
The only science that matters is whatever the technocrats deem to be
true, no matter how much evidence there is against it. We’ve seen this
first hand during this pandemic, as Big Tech has censored and banned
anything going against the opinions of the World Health Organization,
which is just another cog in the technocratic machine.
If we allow this censorship
to continue, the end result will be nothing short of devastating. We
simply must keep pushing for transparency and truth. We must insist on
medical freedom, personal liberty and the right to privacy.
One fight in particular that I don’t see us being able to evade is
the fight against mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations. If we don’t take a
firm stand against that and fight for the right to make our own choice,
there will be no end to the medical tyranny that will follow. As noted
in the Covert Geopolitics article:32
“As you might have guessed, ‘the most important anchor of
recovery’ is for a COVID-19 vaccination … The implication is that
without a vaccine the world will be unable to return to any sense of
normality, particularly in terms of open interaction with your fellow
man …
You can actually participate in the global efforts to cripple
the Deep State organized criminal cabal's ability for genocide, while
enjoying healthcare freedom at the same time, by boycotting Big Pharma
for good.”
Troll them in a chat room, invite them out to your poverty center with a dozen accomplices playing the victim roles and schedule a monthly distribution. Use the same setup with a different name to swindle other hipster dufuses. Farm as many subsidies as they can.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/i-want-build-world-where-someone-me-impossible-meet-trust-fund-brats-trying-destroy