10 potential harms from muzzling yourself with a face mask

In his paper Masks Don’t Work, Denis Rancourt PhD, a retired tenured professor of physics from the University of Ottawa, states: “Many potential harms may arise from broad public policies to wear masks…” He goes on to list the following ten concerns associated with muzzling people:

1. Do used and loaded masks become sources of enhanced transmission, for the wearer and others?
   
2. Do masks become collectors and retainers of pathogens that the mask wearer would otherwise avoid when breathing without a mask?
   
3. Are large droplets captured by a mask atomized or aerolized into breathable components? Can virions escape an evaporating droplet stuck to a mask fiber?
   
4. What are the dangers of bacterial growth on a used and loaded mask?
   
5. How do pathogen-laden droplets interact with environmental dust and aerosols captured on the mask?
   
6. What are long-term health effects on [health care worker], such as headaches, arising from impeded breathing?
   
7. Are there negative social consequences to a masked society?
   
8. Are there negative psychological consequences to wearing a mask, as a fear-based behavioural modification?
   
9. What are the environmental consequences of mask manufacturing and disposal?
   
10. Do the masks shed fibres or substances that are harmful when inhaled?

Now, if masks actually protected people from disease (which study after study show they do not) then a few negative side effects might be worth it. But since masks don’t stop infections, the above list is concerning.

To my knowledge none of these questions have been properly investigated. Sure, I hear them addressed sometimes in news articles. But we are then told to forget about it because some doctor at a local hospital or a researcher at a university said it’s nothing to worry about.

For example, a recent article in my local newspaper said: “These claims about trapped infections have been disputed by infectious disease specialists and virologists, including Sarah Stanley, an associate professor of infectious diseases and vaccinology at the University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health.”

Someone raises a serious concern about the risks of collecting spit in front of their nose and it’s shrugged off because some doctor disputed it. Some researcher who probably receives funding from vaccine manufactures. Because vaccine sales is part of what these masks are about, isn’t it? Wear a mask to protect others. Get the COVID-19 vaccine to protect others. Don’t get the vaccine and you’ll have to wear the mask forever.

Indeed, that’s what a hospital arbitrator deduced when he said that forced masking is a “coercive practice designed to drive up vaccination rates.”

So instead of listening to expert opinions, look at scientific evidence. You don’t need a PhD to read and understand most medical studies. I don’t even have a post-secondary education (left high school a year early and never looked back). Most trials are based on comparing quantifiable results. It’s not hard to understand.

Prof Denis Rancourt’s 13-page report, for example, is (mostly) an easy read. And it’s not influenced by big money as he wrote it on a volunteer basis for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Decide for yourself what is true, instead of going along with popular opinion. It was once popular opinion that cigarettes were good for you.

Remember the words of Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell: “The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. “

Please share this.

Sunrise Exposed

What you are about to see took over two years to compile having infiltrated several leftist organizations. This coming documentary contains exclusive material not found in the public domain. These groups are well funded, tactically trained, highly organized, and part of a global subversive movement that aims to destroy the United States - and it's all coming out before election day. Stay Tuned! 

 

Please support my work by visiting: https://www.subscribestar.com/milliew... https://www.millennialmillie.com

Please share this.

Trudeau Liberals want to create more “hate speech” laws to regulate the internet

The Trudeau Liberals want to regulate digital speech. It's a priority for them that this gets done before the next election. 

They have said it time and time again. 

Trudeau’s Minister of Heritage Steven Guilbeault has said that he wants media to get a license before being allowed to distribute content in Canada. 

Then he and the Liberal Government doubled down on that plan in the throne speech on Wednesday, saying that online hate would be regulated. Whatever that means. 

 See, online hate, and indeed hate of all kinds, is already illegal via Section 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code. Real hate — and what Justin Trudeau calls hate — are two different things though. 

Will Trudeau outlaw "hate speech" against his government? Against Antifa? 

What exactly is hate speech, and do you trust Trudeau to define that? Outside of the House of Commons, we spoke to Minister Guilbeault, the minister responsible for this file — you have to see the reaction.

Why Demand For Seaweed Is About To Boom

 

Please share this.

America 1950 vs. America 2020

by Michael Snyder

If you could go back to 1950, would you do it?  There would be no Internet, no cellphones and you would only be able to watch television in black and white.  But even though they lacked many of our modern conveniences, people genuinely seemed to be much happier back then.  Families actually ate dinner together, neighbors knew and cared about one another, and being an “American” truly meant something.  Today, we like to think that we are so much more “advanced” than they were back then, but the truth is that our society is in the process of falling apart all around us.  Could it be possible that we could learn some important lessons by looking back at how Americans lived 70 years ago?

Of course there has never been any era in our history when everything has been perfect.  But without a doubt, things are vastly different today than they were back in 1950…

In 1950, Texaco Star Theatre, The Lone Ranger and Hopalong Cassidy were some of the most popular shows that Americans watched on television.

In 2020, a Netflix film entitled “Cuties” is so trashy and so disgusting that four states have sent a letter to Netflix asking for it to be removed because it is “fodder for those with criminal imaginations, serving to normalize the view that children are sexual beings.”

In 1950, television networks would not even show husbands and wives in bed together.

In 2020, “adult websites” get more traffic than Netflix, Amazon and Twitter combined.

In 1950, people would greet one another as they walked down the street.

In 2020, Americans are too enamored with their cellphones to be bothered with actual human contact.

In 1950, gum chewing and talking in class were some of the major disciplinary problems in our schools.

In 2020, kids are literally gunning down police officers in the streets.

In 1950, people would make an effort to dress up and look nice when they would go out in public.

In 2020, most of the population has become utter slobs and “People of Walmart” has become one of our most popular memes.

In 1950, the typical woman got married for the first time at age 20 and the typical man got married for the first time at age 22.

In 2020, the typical woman gets married for the first time at age 27 and the typical man gets married for the first time at age 29.

In 1950, a lot of people would leave their homes and their vehicles unlocked because crime rates were so low.

In 2020, many that live in urban areas are deathly afraid of all the civil unrest that has erupted, and gun sales have soared to all-time record highs.

In 1950, Americans actually attempted to parent their children.

In 2020, we pump our kids full of mind-altering drugs and we let our televisions and our video games raise our children.

In 1950, Baltimore was one of the most beautiful and most prosperous cities on the entire planet.

In 2020, Baltimore regularly makes headlines because of all the murders that are constantly occurring.  Of course the exact same thing could be said about many of our other major cities.

In 1950, 78 percent of all households in America contained a married couple.

In 2020, that figure has fallen below 50 percent.

In 1950, about 5 percent of all babies in the United States were born to unmarried parents.

In 2020, about 40 percent of all babies in the United States will be born to unmarried parents.

In 1950, new churches were regularly being opened all over the United States.

In 2020, it is being projected that 1 out of every 5 churches in the U.S. “could be forced to shut their doors in the next 18 months”, and the mayor of Lubbock, Texas just said that opening a new Planned Parenthood clinic is like starting a church.

In 1950, we actually had high standards for our elected officials, and people actually did research on the candidates before they cast their votes.

In 2020, more than 4,000 people in one county in New Hampshire voted for a “transsexual Satanic anarchist” in the Republican primary, and she is now the Republican nominee for sheriff in Cheshire County.

In 1950, children would go outside and play when they got home from school.

In 2020, our parks and our playgrounds are virtually empty and we have the highest childhood obesity rate in the industrialized world.

In 1950, front porches were community gathering areas, and people would regularly have their neighbors over for dinner.

In 2020, many of us don’t know our neighbors at all, and the average American watches more than five hours of television a day.

In 1950, Americans used words such as “knucklehead”, “moxie” and “jalopy”.

In 2020, new terms such as “nomophobia”, “peoplekind” and “social distancing” have been introduced into the English language.

In 1950, the very first credit card was issued in the United States.

In 2020, Americans owe more than 930 billion dollars on their credit cards.

In 1950, one income could support an entire middle class household.

In 2020, tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs and filed for unemployment, and more than half of all households in some of our largest cities are currently facing “serious financial problems”.

In 1950, the American people believed that the free market should govern the economy.

In 2020, most Americans seem to believe that the government in Washington and the Federal Reserve must endlessly “manage” the economy.

In 1950, “socialists” and “communists” were considered to be our greatest national enemies.

In 2020, most of our politicians in Washington have eagerly embraced socialist and communist policy goals.

In 1950, the U.S. Constitution was deeply loved and highly revered.

In 2020, anyone that actually admits to being a “constitutionalist” is considered to be a potential domestic terrorist.

In 1950, the United States loaned more money to the rest of the world than anybody else.

In 2020, the United States owes more money to the rest of the world than anybody else.

In 1950, the total U.S. national debt reached the 257 billion dollar mark for the first time in our history.

In 2020, we added 864 billion dollars to the national debt in the month of June alone.  In other words, we added over three times more to the national debt in that one month than the total amount of debt that had been accumulated from the founding of our nation all the way to 1950.

In 1950, most Americans were generally happy with their lives.

In 2020, the suicide rate is at an all-time record high, and it has been rising every single year since 2007.

Please share this.

Drudge Report Continues Historic Readership Collapse, Down 40% Year Over Year In August

Matt Drudge's Drudge Report website continues what has been a historic crash in viewership in August.

The site's traffic in August fell to 63 million readers, down from 66 million in May, according to True Pundit. Just months ago, in September 2019, the site was regularly garnering 95 million readers.

Comscore data also put Drudge's viewers at 1.488 million unique visitors in July, down 38% from July of 2019, according to The Wrap.

About a year ago, in August 2019, the site was posting "well over 100 million" readers. The site's recent numbers mark a steep 40% decline year over year. They also mark Drudge's lowest numbers in decades.

The slide comes after many conservatives, including President Donald Trump, have asserted that the site had given up its long held conservative ideology. Recall, just hours ago, President Trump tweeted that his people have "all left Drudge," referring to the media mogul as a "confused MESS". 

Our people have all left Drudge. He is a confused MESS, has no clue what happened. Down 51%. @DRUDGE They like REVOLVER and others!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 14, 2020

“Such an honor! Drudge is down 40% plus since he became Fake News. Most importantly, he’s bleeding profusely, and is no longer “hot”. But others are! Lost ALL Trumpers,” Trump wrote in another Tweet.

“Matt Drudge is now firmly a man of the progressive left," Tucker Carlson said at one point. And - not unlike the NFL - the change in Drudge's proverbial game plan is starting to show up in the ratings.

Recall, it was reported by Rasmussen in 2019 that Drudge had sold the site and was "no longer involved in its operations", though details around his involvement remain fuzzy.

But think TruePundit said it best when they concluded: "Obviously. Drudge — if he is even still running the site himself at this point — remains uninterested in slowing the bleeding. And the site isn’t just bleeding out, it is hemorrhaging."


Please share this.

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

 

Transcript and sources: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=2594 

 

Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

Please share this.

Agenda 21, Behind The Planned Destruction of America

What drives the civil unrest we see unfolding in the streets today? Is this an organic form of resistance against an oppressive system of control? Or is there an ulterior motive striving to restructure the current system of control under the guise of social and racial injustice?

Many are afraid to ask these questions because they may be labeled a racist, for daring to question the legitimacy of the groups who seem to defy the rule of law with complete immunity from the judicial system. At the same time they receive the endorsement of political leaders, celebrities and mega corporations.

In this report Spiro is joined by Rosa Koire, a top expert on the United Nations Agenda 21 who authored the book titled 'Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21'

Spiro and Rosa Koire discuss and break down how the United Nations' long standing global governance agendas are materializing before our eyes hidden just beneath the veil of global crisis and social injustice.

Please share this.

Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan claims she has proof COVID-19 was made in Wuhan lab

A Chinese virologist who has reportedly been in hiding for fear of her safety has stepped out into the public eye again to make the explosive claim that she has the scientific evidence to prove COVID-19 was man-made in a lab in China.

Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a scientist who says she did some of the earliest research into COVID-19 last year, made the comments Friday during an interview on British talk show “Loose Women.”

When asked where the deadly virus that has killed more than 900,000 around the globe comes from, Yan — speaking via video chat from a secret location — replied, “It comes from the lab — the lab in Wuhan and the lab is controlled by China’s government.”

She insisted that widespread reports that the virus originated last year from a wet market in Wuhan, China, are “a smokescreen.”

“The first thing is the [meat] market in Wuhan … is a smokescreen and this virus is not from nature,” Yan claimed, explaining that she got “her intelligence from the CDC in China, from the local doctors.”

The virologist has previously accused Beijing of lying about when it learned of the killer bug and engaging in an extensive cover-up of her work.

She had said that her former supervisors at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, a reference laboratory for the World Health Organization, silenced her when she sounded the alarm about human-to-human transmission in December last year.

In April, Yan reportedly fled Hong Kong and escaped to America to raise awareness about the pandemic.

Now, she said she is planning to release scientific evidence to prove that the virus was made inside a lab in Wuhan.

“The genome sequence is like a human finger print,” she told the talk show. “So based on this you can identify these things. I use the evidence … to tell people why this has come from the lab in China, why they are the only ones who made it.”

Yan added, “Anyone, even if you have no biology knowledge, you can read it, and you can check and identify and verify by yourself.”

“This is the critical thing for us to know the origin of the virus,” she said. “If not we cannot overcome it — it will be life-threatening for everyone.”

She said she is coming out now because “I know if I don’t tell the truth to the world, I will be regretful.”

Yan also claimed that before fleeing China, her information was wiped from government databases.

“They deleted all my information,” she told “Loose Women,” claiming that people have been recruited “to spread rumors about me, that I’m a liar.”

Yuan Zhiming, the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has previously denied reports that the bug accidentally spread from his facility.

“There’s no way this virus came from us,” Zhiming told state media in April.
Please share this.

Pregnant Australian Mom Arrested for Facebook Post

Australia allowed BLM protests but is arresting people who organize protests against their lockdown.

Please share this.

A 35 Minute Interview on Political Islam

Topics include: Islamic Golden Age; the future of Islam; reforming Islam; the slave trade; Islamic dualism, poverty and Islam; why Macron will not be able to create a European Islam; the difference between opinion and facts; what I like about Islam and the difference between our civilization and Islamic civilization.

Please share this.

Slavery - The Whole Story

Most people do not know the complete story of slavery. The half story of slavery is the evil white man on a wooden ship on the west coast of Africa. The whole story includes the fact that all of the slaves sent to the Americas were sold by Muslim slave wholesalers. Political Islam has a complete doctrine of slavery. Mohammed was involved in every aspect of slavery. He captured slaves, received them as gifts, and owned slaves of all races. Only Kafirs could be enslaved. Historically, all nations used slaves. The reason for the ending of slavery was that we built better slaves with engines and machinery, not our moral superiority. John Azumah: The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa
Please share this.