Sunday, April 28, 2013
A View From Space with Gary Bell, April 27, 2013
TOPICS: in depth detail about the Boston bombings
DOWNLOAD LINKS: http://depositfiles.com/files/9sj50l3f9
Please share this.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
The New World Order History Of April Sacrifices
They were gonna have a dirty bomb in Boston, blame it on the Iranians! We know who that benefits. Cui Bono? Why else do we see Mercs with radiation detectors out right after the blast? Debka was dumping all over the FBI after the incident. WHY? Because the FBI reduced the incident down to nails and BBs. Catch the perps, but with minimal damage.....Why are Obama supporters so obsessed with taking guns & freedom of speech through the internet arming terrorists in Syria,Libya,Egypt, arming DHS better than our military, yet anyone who questions this is called a nut job or is wearing tin foil hats, No we just hate Obama because he is a war criminal just like Bush & Clinton, and those President are secret society members who had to do homosexual acts in Bohemien Grove to be President that's just gay!
Please share this.
Uncle Ruslan Married to Daughter of Top CIA Official
Ruslan Tsarni: Married to the CIA?
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 27, 2013
According to new research, Uncle Ruslan, aka Ruslan Tsarni, was married to the daughter of former top CIA official Graham Fuller.
This is an interesting discovery considering Tsarni is at the forefront of the effort to convince the American people that Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the alleged and now dead Boston bomber, was “brainwashed” by a shadowy Armenian named Misha.
“This person just took his brain. He just brainwashed him completely,” Uncle Ruslan insisted during a news conference.
“Tamerlan’s relationship with Misha could be a clue in understanding the motives behind his religious transformation and, ultimately, the attack itself,” the Associated Press argued earlier this week.
Problem is, nobody can find Misha to verify the claim. “Efforts over several days by the Associated Press to identify and interview Misha have been unsuccessful,” the AP admits.
Some believe the mysterious and absent Misha was Tsarnaev’s FBI handler. More than likely, Tamerlan was radicalized by the CIA, not some Armenian who is now conveniently missing.
Considering the large number of patsies set-up by the FBI and then busted with triumphant headlines used to extend and extoll the manufactured war on terrorism, this possibility cannot be discarded.
“The discovery that Uncle Ruslan Tsarni had spy connections that go far deeper than had been previously known is ironic, especially since the mainstream media’s focus yesterday was on a feverish search to find who might have recruited the Tsarnaev brothers,” writes Daniel Hopsicker.
Tsarni also had connections to USAID – the outfit involved in overthrowing governments and related skulduggery – and Halliburton.
Of course such pertinent details have yet to make their way into the establishment media’s non-stop script reading on the Boston bombings and the orchestrated effort to pin the blame on the Brothers Tsarnaev who are obviously witless patsies.
Unlike many previous attempts to manufacture terrorism for propaganda purposes, this time around there are a large number of inconsistencies and outright falsehoods.
Naturally, all of them are ignored by the corporate media as it hammers out a narrative that will be used to steal more constitutional rights from the American people.
Please share this.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
A View From Space with Gary Bell, April 20, 2013
TOPICS: Boston Bombings, Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev,Maret Tsarnaev, Illuminati, New world order, Royalty, The Dark Knight, Numerology, Astrotheology, Sacred Geometry
DOWNLOAD LINK: http://depositfiles.com/files/iupopgr0d
Please share this.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Seth MacFarlane Slams Boston Bombings 'Family Guy' Conspiracy Theory
The Fox TV network has pulled a recent episode of Family Guy
from the internet, streaming services and its television rotation after
segments were edited together to show an incident similar to the Boston
Marathon bombings.
Fox spokeswoman Gaude Paez said Tuesday the episode has been removed from Fox.com and Hulu.com and the network will not again air the episode, dating from March 17.
In the episode "Turban Cowboy," main character Peter Griffin is driving and seen crashing into a runner in order to win a race.
When asked by sports announcer Bob Costas about his performance, he says: "I'll tell ya, Bob, I just got in my car and drove it... And when there was a guy in my way, I killed him."
Later in the same episode, Peter befriends a man plotting to blow up a bridge. His new "friend" gives him a cellphone and when he dials it, an explosion and screams are heard.
An online mash-up created this week links the two parts of the episode, depicting a storyline that parallels Monday's bombings at the Boston Marathon that resulted in three fatalities and injured more than 170 others. Paez said that Fox officials were working with video-sharing site YouTube to remove the mash-up.
Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane blasted the edited clip, which began circulating online on Tuesday.
"The edited Family Guy clip currently circulating is abhorrent," he posted via Twitter. "The event was a crime and a tragedy, and my thoughts are with the victims."
Meanwhile, in the U.K., a private TV network removed the film Four Lions from its schedule. The comedy follows a group of witless young British Muslims planning to bomb a local marathon. Film4 said Wednesday it has decided not to proceed with the broadcast "in light of recent tragic events."
A previous episode of Family Guy was previously pulled following December's Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, in which 20 children were killed in Newtown, Conn.
Fox spokeswoman Gaude Paez said Tuesday the episode has been removed from Fox.com and Hulu.com and the network will not again air the episode, dating from March 17.
In the episode "Turban Cowboy," main character Peter Griffin is driving and seen crashing into a runner in order to win a race.
When asked by sports announcer Bob Costas about his performance, he says: "I'll tell ya, Bob, I just got in my car and drove it... And when there was a guy in my way, I killed him."
Later in the same episode, Peter befriends a man plotting to blow up a bridge. His new "friend" gives him a cellphone and when he dials it, an explosion and screams are heard.
An online mash-up created this week links the two parts of the episode, depicting a storyline that parallels Monday's bombings at the Boston Marathon that resulted in three fatalities and injured more than 170 others. Paez said that Fox officials were working with video-sharing site YouTube to remove the mash-up.
Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane blasted the edited clip, which began circulating online on Tuesday.
"The edited Family Guy clip currently circulating is abhorrent," he posted via Twitter. "The event was a crime and a tragedy, and my thoughts are with the victims."
Meanwhile, in the U.K., a private TV network removed the film Four Lions from its schedule. The comedy follows a group of witless young British Muslims planning to bomb a local marathon. Film4 said Wednesday it has decided not to proceed with the broadcast "in light of recent tragic events."
A previous episode of Family Guy was previously pulled following December's Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, in which 20 children were killed in Newtown, Conn.
Please share this.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
A View From Space with Gary Bell, April 14, 2013
TOPICS: Fairy Blood, Royalty, Illuminati, Osiris, Merovingian Bloodline, Prince William, Prince Charles, Aliester Crowley, Ancient Calendars, Aliens, N.W.O
DOWNLOAD LINK: http://depositfiles.com/files/j6aqpt7nu
Please share this.
Friday, April 12, 2013
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013
“MK ULTRA Mind Control Rules in Hollywood”: Roseanne Barr
Roseanne Barr is an outspoken actress and comedienne who never shied away from tackling difficult and controversial issues, even if that meant being unpopular or being tagged as “crazy” by mass media. While I can’t say that I agree with all of her views, she remains one of the very few people in Hollywood who dare talking about its most damning issue: MK ULTRA.
In a recent interview with RT, Roseanne talked about the dark side of the entertainment industry and directly mentioned MK ULTRA as being a major force in Hollywood. Here’s the interview (it is set up to start at the part about the entertainment industry).
Roseanne basically says that Hollywood stars are terrified of using their status to speak out about important issues because there’s a “culture of fear” going on there, where “speaking out” almost automatically equals being shunned from the industry and having one’s career destroyed.
More importantly she adds:
“It’s also a big culture of Mind Control. MK ULTRA Mind Control rules in Hollywood.”
This means that many stars do not speak out because they literally cannot do so. They are mind controlled which means that they have alter personas programmed into them that handler are able to trigger and control at will. (For more information on the subject read the article entitled Origins and Techniques of Monarch Mind Control).
Roseanne Talking About Mind Control in the Past
The above television interview is not the only instance where Roseanne managed to slip mentions of MK Ultra in mass media. During a CNN interview with Larry King which aired on August 16, 2001, Roseanne talks about trauma-based mind control and MK ULTRA (I placed important parts in bold).
KING: All right, some see what you have or had as a serious psychological disorder.
ROSEANNE: I like how you just keep going.
KING: Others as psychological fad. Also…
ROSEANNE: A fad?
KING: Whether it’s deliberately induced or naturally occurring.
ROSEANNE: Well, I have this head shrinker and he says it’s deliberately induced because the CIA is where they started inducing it when after they brought all the Nazis over from Germany to run American Psychiatric Association.
KING: What are you about?
ROSEANNE: I’m telling you the truth. It is all mind control and all kinds of things to invent people with multiple personalities.
KING: So you have been captured by Nazis?
ROSEANNE: The government. Well in a way, I believe the government has implanted some kind of a chip into my head where…
KING: Roseanne.
ROSEANNE: You know, is monitored by Barbara Walters and these other women. And they take all my ideas and I’m, you know.
KING: Yes, is Oprah one of the people monitoring?
ROSEANNE: Of course.
KING: She’s definitely in touch?
ROSEANNE: Definitely. I think she sits with her finger on the switch to the chip.
(…)
KING: Let me read something to you, that you wrote in “Esquire.” And I want…
ROSEANNE: OK.
KING: …your reaction it. This is your writing.
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: In a notebook entry about yourself, you keep notebooks about yourself?
ROSEANNE: Of course I do, thousands, thousands.
KING: Thousands of notebooks.
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: Well, this one says, “So this my life, my true E-Hollywood story. It’s the story of multi, multiple multi-faceted girl, woman, boy poet, dancer, comedian, singer, freedom fighter, warrior, message bearer, performer, mother, sex partner, wife, actor, producer, director pioneer, autistic child, survivor of post dramatic stress, borderline bipolar, overweight, Turrets sufferer, multiple personality disorder, obsessive compulsive victim of psychiatric, planting of false memories, heretic witch, crone, take your pick. There’s been about 300 diagnoses which proves shrinks have been my only friends.”
ROSEANNE: That is true that shrinks have been my dearest friends.
(…)
KING: You never get mad to say God has done me a dirty deal here when my multiple personalities take over?
ROSEANNE: No, because I feel like God — honestly I feel God gives you multiple personality disorder when there’s too much stress in your life to handle it any other way. I think it is a gift to children.
KING: So another thing can take over?
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: Another person deal with this?
ROSEANNE: Yes. I mean, you know, you’re not the one that’s insane. It’s the place you are in. So you have to adapt to it.
- Source: CNN Transcripts
In that interview, Roseanne claimed that she suffered intense trauma in her childhood, which lead to her having multiple personalities and being manipulated by CIA-lead psychiatric experiments (MK ULTRA).
Roseanne also uses her blog to discuss MK ULTRA in Hollywood. In a 2009 post, she even stated that Joe Jackson (Michael Jackson’s father) was a CIA MK ULTRA operative.
joe jackson is an mk ultra operative
who’s abuse of his own children was used to profit the CIA’s programs that follow and study the effects of child abuse on the young, and how their minds can be controlled to such an extent, and with such abuse, that they can be forced to develop talent. jesus said ‘the truth will confound you in that day’.
joe jackson is a child abuser, and catherine looked the other way while he beat their kids and tortured michael mentally. keep them both away from michael’s kids.
- Source: Roseanne World
In the wake of the Newtown tragedy, Roseanne posted an article written by her friend John Philips who went deep into the issues of psychological warfare on the American public, mind control, its connection to powerful occultists and organizations such as the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set and the importance of mass media to indoctrinate the masses. Here are important parts of the article.
Mind War and the Tragedy in Newtown by John Phillips
(…)
“In 1980 as Ronald Reagan ushered in the era of greed is good, Major Michael Aquino wrote under the direction of Paul Valley, Army commander of the 7th Psychological Operation Group in San Francisco, a paper called “From PSYOP to Mind War: The Psychology of Victory”. Michael Aquino proposes that the concepts of Psychological Operation (PSYOP) are outdated, and that we need a new way to explain how the military can use psychological warfare to achieve their goals. Aquino states:
“So let us begin with the simple name change. We shall rid ourselves of the self-conscious, almost “embarrassed” concept of “psychological operations”. In its place we shall create MindWar. The term is harsh and fear inspiring, so it should be: It is a term of attack and victory- not one of the rationalizations and coaxing and conciliation. The enemy may be offended by it: that is quite right as long as he is defeated by it. A definition is offered: MindWar is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war.”
(…)
In 1976 during the Church Committee Congressional investigation into abuses within the military and intelligence community, the public discovered that a CIA project originally called Bluebird sought to learn how to control both individual behavior and to influence culture as a whole. The creation of a Manchurian Candidate whose behavior could be controlled was the ultimate goal of this research. Scientists associated with the project have admitted that they succeeded in their goals by the mid 1950’s. All government agencies were ordered to stop research on individuals who had sometimes become unwitting victims, in a research program the violated all the provisions for human research laid out at the Nuremburg Trials.
CIA Director William Colby had ordered the destruction of many of the documents related to this research, and unfortunately the Church Committee really only got a small glimpse of the program that victimized 1000’s of individuals under the cover of “scientific research.”
More importantly the Church Committee failed, because it chose not to reveal to the public any information concerning the CIA agencies attempt to influence “American Culture.” To control the public discourse the CIA felt it needed to control and manipulate culture so they could accomplish their goals.
While all the agencies involved in violating the Nuremburg Treaty told the Congressional Committee that all research in this area had been stopped, there is irrefutable evidence that both the program to control individuals behavior and culture at large have continued. At the heart of this research lays the Devil, and until we as a society decide to seize the power of communication away from the Devil, these tragedies will not only continue but intensify. How did individual behavior change in desperate young adults? Because their education taught them that mass killing was OK, justifiable, a good way out of distress. The MindWar was alive and well, the military was succeeding in their objectives.
As the “New Age” movement sprang into popular culture in California in the early 1960’s, Crowley’s work was promoted by Anton LeVey who was the founder of the “Church of Satan” in 1966. Michael Aquino, the author of MindWar, was an active disciple of the Church of Satan and later went on to found his own cult called “The Temple of Set.”
(…)
If you want to know if MindWar is still alive and well, at the recent MTV music awards the MC encouraged all those in the audience to give and the sign of the devil and worship Satan to which he got an enthusiast response. If Norbert Weiner were alive today, he would surely tell us that society was losing its battle with the Manichean Devil.
(…)
It is time for us to closely examine how we educate our children, and the role that the abundance of information available to our youth through the corporately controlled media has on their perceptions of reality. One does not have to look too closely at American Culture to realize that our children have been robbed of their childhoods, by a media machine that insists on putting profits before children. While controlling the number of guns on our streets may have a minimal impact on the safety of our children, until we address the impact of the military industrial complex on the minds and soul of our children, we will live in a country that worships the Manichean Devil.
Many believe that eliminating prayer in our public schools has led to the moral corruption of our youth, without first asking how the United States Army division of Psychological Warfare became actively involved in promoting Satan Worship among our youth? You reap what you sewn, when you condition a certain subset of children to worship the devil, train them in the video arcade to kill without remorse, and then drug them because they have abnormal behavior, you set the stage for National Tragedy.”
Please share this.
In a recent interview with RT, Roseanne talked about the dark side of the entertainment industry and directly mentioned MK ULTRA as being a major force in Hollywood. Here’s the interview (it is set up to start at the part about the entertainment industry).
Roseanne basically says that Hollywood stars are terrified of using their status to speak out about important issues because there’s a “culture of fear” going on there, where “speaking out” almost automatically equals being shunned from the industry and having one’s career destroyed.
More importantly she adds:
“It’s also a big culture of Mind Control. MK ULTRA Mind Control rules in Hollywood.”
This means that many stars do not speak out because they literally cannot do so. They are mind controlled which means that they have alter personas programmed into them that handler are able to trigger and control at will. (For more information on the subject read the article entitled Origins and Techniques of Monarch Mind Control).
Roseanne Talking About Mind Control in the Past
The above television interview is not the only instance where Roseanne managed to slip mentions of MK Ultra in mass media. During a CNN interview with Larry King which aired on August 16, 2001, Roseanne talks about trauma-based mind control and MK ULTRA (I placed important parts in bold).
KING: All right, some see what you have or had as a serious psychological disorder.
ROSEANNE: I like how you just keep going.
KING: Others as psychological fad. Also…
ROSEANNE: A fad?
KING: Whether it’s deliberately induced or naturally occurring.
ROSEANNE: Well, I have this head shrinker and he says it’s deliberately induced because the CIA is where they started inducing it when after they brought all the Nazis over from Germany to run American Psychiatric Association.
KING: What are you about?
ROSEANNE: I’m telling you the truth. It is all mind control and all kinds of things to invent people with multiple personalities.
KING: So you have been captured by Nazis?
ROSEANNE: The government. Well in a way, I believe the government has implanted some kind of a chip into my head where…
KING: Roseanne.
ROSEANNE: You know, is monitored by Barbara Walters and these other women. And they take all my ideas and I’m, you know.
KING: Yes, is Oprah one of the people monitoring?
ROSEANNE: Of course.
KING: She’s definitely in touch?
ROSEANNE: Definitely. I think she sits with her finger on the switch to the chip.
(…)
KING: Let me read something to you, that you wrote in “Esquire.” And I want…
ROSEANNE: OK.
KING: …your reaction it. This is your writing.
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: In a notebook entry about yourself, you keep notebooks about yourself?
ROSEANNE: Of course I do, thousands, thousands.
KING: Thousands of notebooks.
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: Well, this one says, “So this my life, my true E-Hollywood story. It’s the story of multi, multiple multi-faceted girl, woman, boy poet, dancer, comedian, singer, freedom fighter, warrior, message bearer, performer, mother, sex partner, wife, actor, producer, director pioneer, autistic child, survivor of post dramatic stress, borderline bipolar, overweight, Turrets sufferer, multiple personality disorder, obsessive compulsive victim of psychiatric, planting of false memories, heretic witch, crone, take your pick. There’s been about 300 diagnoses which proves shrinks have been my only friends.”
ROSEANNE: That is true that shrinks have been my dearest friends.
(…)
KING: You never get mad to say God has done me a dirty deal here when my multiple personalities take over?
ROSEANNE: No, because I feel like God — honestly I feel God gives you multiple personality disorder when there’s too much stress in your life to handle it any other way. I think it is a gift to children.
KING: So another thing can take over?
ROSEANNE: Yes.
KING: Another person deal with this?
ROSEANNE: Yes. I mean, you know, you’re not the one that’s insane. It’s the place you are in. So you have to adapt to it.
- Source: CNN Transcripts
In that interview, Roseanne claimed that she suffered intense trauma in her childhood, which lead to her having multiple personalities and being manipulated by CIA-lead psychiatric experiments (MK ULTRA).
Roseanne also uses her blog to discuss MK ULTRA in Hollywood. In a 2009 post, she even stated that Joe Jackson (Michael Jackson’s father) was a CIA MK ULTRA operative.
joe jackson is an mk ultra operative
who’s abuse of his own children was used to profit the CIA’s programs that follow and study the effects of child abuse on the young, and how their minds can be controlled to such an extent, and with such abuse, that they can be forced to develop talent. jesus said ‘the truth will confound you in that day’.
joe jackson is a child abuser, and catherine looked the other way while he beat their kids and tortured michael mentally. keep them both away from michael’s kids.
- Source: Roseanne World
In the wake of the Newtown tragedy, Roseanne posted an article written by her friend John Philips who went deep into the issues of psychological warfare on the American public, mind control, its connection to powerful occultists and organizations such as the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set and the importance of mass media to indoctrinate the masses. Here are important parts of the article.
Mind War and the Tragedy in Newtown by John Phillips
(…)
“In 1980 as Ronald Reagan ushered in the era of greed is good, Major Michael Aquino wrote under the direction of Paul Valley, Army commander of the 7th Psychological Operation Group in San Francisco, a paper called “From PSYOP to Mind War: The Psychology of Victory”. Michael Aquino proposes that the concepts of Psychological Operation (PSYOP) are outdated, and that we need a new way to explain how the military can use psychological warfare to achieve their goals. Aquino states:
“So let us begin with the simple name change. We shall rid ourselves of the self-conscious, almost “embarrassed” concept of “psychological operations”. In its place we shall create MindWar. The term is harsh and fear inspiring, so it should be: It is a term of attack and victory- not one of the rationalizations and coaxing and conciliation. The enemy may be offended by it: that is quite right as long as he is defeated by it. A definition is offered: MindWar is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war.”
(…)
In 1976 during the Church Committee Congressional investigation into abuses within the military and intelligence community, the public discovered that a CIA project originally called Bluebird sought to learn how to control both individual behavior and to influence culture as a whole. The creation of a Manchurian Candidate whose behavior could be controlled was the ultimate goal of this research. Scientists associated with the project have admitted that they succeeded in their goals by the mid 1950’s. All government agencies were ordered to stop research on individuals who had sometimes become unwitting victims, in a research program the violated all the provisions for human research laid out at the Nuremburg Trials.
CIA Director William Colby had ordered the destruction of many of the documents related to this research, and unfortunately the Church Committee really only got a small glimpse of the program that victimized 1000’s of individuals under the cover of “scientific research.”
More importantly the Church Committee failed, because it chose not to reveal to the public any information concerning the CIA agencies attempt to influence “American Culture.” To control the public discourse the CIA felt it needed to control and manipulate culture so they could accomplish their goals.
While all the agencies involved in violating the Nuremburg Treaty told the Congressional Committee that all research in this area had been stopped, there is irrefutable evidence that both the program to control individuals behavior and culture at large have continued. At the heart of this research lays the Devil, and until we as a society decide to seize the power of communication away from the Devil, these tragedies will not only continue but intensify. How did individual behavior change in desperate young adults? Because their education taught them that mass killing was OK, justifiable, a good way out of distress. The MindWar was alive and well, the military was succeeding in their objectives.
As the “New Age” movement sprang into popular culture in California in the early 1960’s, Crowley’s work was promoted by Anton LeVey who was the founder of the “Church of Satan” in 1966. Michael Aquino, the author of MindWar, was an active disciple of the Church of Satan and later went on to found his own cult called “The Temple of Set.”
(…)
If you want to know if MindWar is still alive and well, at the recent MTV music awards the MC encouraged all those in the audience to give and the sign of the devil and worship Satan to which he got an enthusiast response. If Norbert Weiner were alive today, he would surely tell us that society was losing its battle with the Manichean Devil.
(…)
It is time for us to closely examine how we educate our children, and the role that the abundance of information available to our youth through the corporately controlled media has on their perceptions of reality. One does not have to look too closely at American Culture to realize that our children have been robbed of their childhoods, by a media machine that insists on putting profits before children. While controlling the number of guns on our streets may have a minimal impact on the safety of our children, until we address the impact of the military industrial complex on the minds and soul of our children, we will live in a country that worships the Manichean Devil.
Many believe that eliminating prayer in our public schools has led to the moral corruption of our youth, without first asking how the United States Army division of Psychological Warfare became actively involved in promoting Satan Worship among our youth? You reap what you sewn, when you condition a certain subset of children to worship the devil, train them in the video arcade to kill without remorse, and then drug them because they have abnormal behavior, you set the stage for National Tragedy.”
Please share this.
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Guns Save Lives
by Thomas Sowell
Recently by Thomas Sowell: Intellectuals and Race
We all know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives – much less see any hard facts comparing how many lives are lost and how many are saved.
But that trade-off is the real issue, not the Second Amendment or the National Rifle Association, which so many in the media obsess about. If guns cost more lives than they save, we can always repeal the Second Amendment. But if guns save more lives than they cost, we need to know that, instead of spending time demonizing the National Rifle Association.
The defensive use of guns is usually either not discussed at all in the media or else is depicted as if it means bullets flying in all directions, like the gunfight at the OK Corral. But most defensive uses of guns do not involve actually pulling the trigger.
If someone comes at you with a knife and you point a gun at him, he is very unlikely to keep coming, and far more likely to head in the other direction, perhaps in some haste, if he has a brain in his head. Only if he is an idiot are you likely to have to pull the trigger. And if he is an idiot with a knife coming after you, you had better have a trigger to pull.
Surveys of American gun owners have found that 4 to 6 percent reported using a gun in self-defense within the previous five years. That is not a very high percentage but, in a country with 300 million people, that works out to hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns per year.
Yet we almost never hear about these hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns from the media, which will report the killing of a dozen people endlessly around the clock.
The murder of a dozen innocent people is unquestionably a human tragedy. But that is no excuse for reacting blindly by preventing hundreds of thousands of other people from defending themselves against meeting the same fate.
Although most defensive uses of guns do not involve actually shooting, nevertheless the total number of criminals killed by armed private citizens runs into the thousands per year. A gun can also come in handy if a pit bull or some other dangerous animal is after you or your child.
We need to recognize the painful reality that, regardless of what we do or don't do about gun control laws, there will be innocent people killed by guns. We can then look at hard facts in order to decide how we can minimize the number of needless deaths.
But that is not the way the issue is presented by many in politics or the media. Every story about an accidental shooting in the home will be repeated again and again, while a thousand stories about lives saved by defensive uses of a gun will never see the light of day in most newspapers or on most television newscasts.
More children may die in bathtub accidents than in shooting accidents, but you are not likely to read that in most newspapers or see it on television newscasts. Some in the media inflate the number of children killed by counting as children the members of criminal teenage gangs who shoot each other in their turf fights.
Many seize upon statistics which show that Britain has stronger gun control laws than the United States and lower murder rates. Yet they ignore other countries with stronger gun control laws than the United States, but which have much higher murder rates, such as Brazil, Russia and Mexico.
Even in the case of Britain, London had a much lower murder rate than New York during the years after New York State's 1911 Sullivan Law imposed very strict gun control, while anyone could buy a shotgun in London with no questions asked in the 1950s.
Today, virtually the entire law-abiding population of Britain is disarmed – and gun crimes are vastly more common. Gun control laws make crime a safer occupation when victims are unarmed.
The gun control crusade today is like the Prohibition crusade 100 years ago. It is a shared zealotry that binds the self-righteous know-it-alls in a warm fellowship of those who see themselves as fighting on the side of the angels against the forces of evil. It is a lofty role that they are not about to give up for anything so mundane as facts – or even the lives of other people.
April 3, 2013
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page.
Please share this.
Recently by Thomas Sowell: Intellectuals and Race
We all know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives – much less see any hard facts comparing how many lives are lost and how many are saved.
But that trade-off is the real issue, not the Second Amendment or the National Rifle Association, which so many in the media obsess about. If guns cost more lives than they save, we can always repeal the Second Amendment. But if guns save more lives than they cost, we need to know that, instead of spending time demonizing the National Rifle Association.
The defensive use of guns is usually either not discussed at all in the media or else is depicted as if it means bullets flying in all directions, like the gunfight at the OK Corral. But most defensive uses of guns do not involve actually pulling the trigger.
If someone comes at you with a knife and you point a gun at him, he is very unlikely to keep coming, and far more likely to head in the other direction, perhaps in some haste, if he has a brain in his head. Only if he is an idiot are you likely to have to pull the trigger. And if he is an idiot with a knife coming after you, you had better have a trigger to pull.
Surveys of American gun owners have found that 4 to 6 percent reported using a gun in self-defense within the previous five years. That is not a very high percentage but, in a country with 300 million people, that works out to hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns per year.
Yet we almost never hear about these hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns from the media, which will report the killing of a dozen people endlessly around the clock.
The murder of a dozen innocent people is unquestionably a human tragedy. But that is no excuse for reacting blindly by preventing hundreds of thousands of other people from defending themselves against meeting the same fate.
Although most defensive uses of guns do not involve actually shooting, nevertheless the total number of criminals killed by armed private citizens runs into the thousands per year. A gun can also come in handy if a pit bull or some other dangerous animal is after you or your child.
We need to recognize the painful reality that, regardless of what we do or don't do about gun control laws, there will be innocent people killed by guns. We can then look at hard facts in order to decide how we can minimize the number of needless deaths.
But that is not the way the issue is presented by many in politics or the media. Every story about an accidental shooting in the home will be repeated again and again, while a thousand stories about lives saved by defensive uses of a gun will never see the light of day in most newspapers or on most television newscasts.
More children may die in bathtub accidents than in shooting accidents, but you are not likely to read that in most newspapers or see it on television newscasts. Some in the media inflate the number of children killed by counting as children the members of criminal teenage gangs who shoot each other in their turf fights.
Many seize upon statistics which show that Britain has stronger gun control laws than the United States and lower murder rates. Yet they ignore other countries with stronger gun control laws than the United States, but which have much higher murder rates, such as Brazil, Russia and Mexico.
Even in the case of Britain, London had a much lower murder rate than New York during the years after New York State's 1911 Sullivan Law imposed very strict gun control, while anyone could buy a shotgun in London with no questions asked in the 1950s.
Today, virtually the entire law-abiding population of Britain is disarmed – and gun crimes are vastly more common. Gun control laws make crime a safer occupation when victims are unarmed.
The gun control crusade today is like the Prohibition crusade 100 years ago. It is a shared zealotry that binds the self-righteous know-it-alls in a warm fellowship of those who see themselves as fighting on the side of the angels against the forces of evil. It is a lofty role that they are not about to give up for anything so mundane as facts – or even the lives of other people.
April 3, 2013
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page.
Please share this.
Monday, April 1, 2013
Breaking: Air Force “Chemtrail” Manual Available For Download
Download USAF Academy “Chemtrails 131 Manual Fall 1990″ PDF
_______________
Many
observers of the past two decades of covert aerosol geoengineering
adopted the term “chemtrails” to describe unnatural emissions and trails
originating from military jet engines. If the term Chemtrails
originated at the DoD we could suspect the term came into wide civilian
use when a cadet or instructor repeated it so often that “Chemtrails”
was adopted by civilian observers to describe unusual jet aircraft
contrails. To their credit, the Oxford dictionary provides an accurate description of chemtrails even if they failed to list the US DoD as the original published source.
chemtrail – Syllabification: (chem·trail) – Pronunciation: /ˈkemˌtrāl/
Definition of chemtrail noun
Origin: 1990s: blend of chemical and trail, on the pattern of contrail (Source)
In etymological
terms, the origin of a word is very important. Regardless the
intended definition, history clearly shows the term “Chemtrails”
originated at the US Department of Defense as the title for a Chemistry
manual used at the Air Force Academy cadet training program in the
early 1990′s. Two editions of the “Chemtrails” manual are known to
exist – A 200 page version for the 1990 Fall class and a 232 page
version for the 1991 class. The course title “chemtrails” was so popular
as to be adopted by the DoD for at least two academic years
(1990-1991).
About the Chemtrails Manual Cover
- The Air Force Academy Chemtrails manual cover shows a flame from a Bunsen burner that appears to be producing two “trails”.
- The title of the manual “Chemtrails” is printed between the two “trails”.
- Considering the intentional graphic depicting “trails” it’s possible the Bunsen burner represents a jet engine producing “chemically” induced, persistent contrails.
- A Bunsen burner is a common piece of laboratory equipment that produces a single open gas flame which is used for heating, sterilization, and combustion.
- A test tube filled with a liquid is emptying contents into a flask.
- The remaining graphic appears to be a chemical representation for “methane” (CH4). Since Natural gas contains mostly “methane” it’s possible this symbol alludes to the fuel providing the flame to the Bunsen burner. (Natural Gas)
Method:
An inter-library loan from the Alachua County main library yielded a
microfilm copy of the 1990 Chemistry 131 Manual used in training by the
US Air force Academy. The lending institution was the William T. Young
Library at the University of Kentucky as shown in the label below.
The
microfilm was in acceptable condition, however the 1990 Chemtrails
manual was scanned in 1992 under less than optimum conditions from a
used hard copy in less than good condition.
The Alachua
County Library equipment was used to scan each of the 200 pages to
digital *.TIF files. Photoshop was used to optimize each image to the
smallest file size that would permit adequate resolution for on-line
viewing. Each image was imported to a Microsoft Word page where the
complete manual was saved to a 30 MB PDF file. (Portable Document File).
NOTE: A second edition of Chemtrails (232 pages) was published for the Fall 1991 class of Air Force cadets.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)