BY ISRAEL SHAMIR – The Jewish chosen-ness led to genocide time and again. Outside of Jerusalem’s Jaffa gate (Bab al-Halil), there was once a small neighbourhood called Mamilla, destroyed by real-estate developers just a few years ago.
During the development works, the workers came upon a burial cave holding hundreds of sculls and bones. It was adorned by a cross and the legend: ‘God alone knows their names’.
The dead were laid to their eternal rest in AD 614, the most dreadful year in the history of Palestine until the Twentieth Century. The Scottish scholar Adam Smith (1723-1790), wrote in his Historical Geography of Palestine: “until now, the terrible devastation of 614 is visible in the land, it could not be healed”.
Jews massacred between 60,000 and 90,000 Palestinian Christians in Jerusalem alone, almost 1.5 million in today’s values (the total earth’s population was according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica about 300 million, twenty times smaller than today). A few days later, the Persian military understood the magnitude of the massacre and stopped the Jews. CONTINUE READING
Walt Heyer is an author and public speaker who formerly identified and
lived as transgender. He is the author of several books, and through his
website, SexChangeRegret.com, Heyer raises public awareness about those
who regret gender change and the tragic consequences suffered as a
result. He shared his story and warned against implementing radical
hormonal and surgical interventions for gender dysphoric children.
Watch the full event here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnP_W...
by Stephen Kokx
Steve Bannon’s emergence from political obscurity continued last Thursday
during an appearance on EWTN’s The World Over with Raymond Arroyo,
where he criticized Pope Francis not only for siding with “globalists” on
immigration but also for striking a deal with communist China on the
nomination of Catholic bishops.
Since unceremoniously exiting the White House in August 2017, a move that
angered many of President Trump’s America First supporters, the former
presidential adviser has largely remained out of the public spotlight,
preferring to spend most of his time in
Europe helping nationalist politicians. In recent months, however, he’s
delivered remarks to the Oxford
Student Union, was interviewed by CNN and NBC, appeared
on CBS, and spoke
to Politico.com. Most of his comments have been about the 2020 election
and foreign affairs.
Bannon and Arroyo’s wide-ranging discussion (watch below) touched on
everything from the Vatican sex
abuse summit and the political ramifications of the Mueller report to
Bannon’s Italy-based
“gladiator” school aimed at defending what he calls “the
Judeo-Christian West.” The majority of the pair’s conversation was spent
analyzing the worldwide populist movement and the Far East.
China is “an existential threat” to the United States, said Bannon, who
recently founded
Citizens of the American Republic, a non-profit that promotes economic
nationalism. “They’ve been at economic war with us for 25 years[.] ...
They’re trying to become the new hegemon in this totalitarian, mercantilist
system they’ve got.”
Bannon said China wants to unite the Eurasian landmass and boost its
manufacturing industry but Trump is not allowing that to happen. He’s the
first president in 30 years to stand up to them and to put a halt to the
U.S.’s “managed decline,” Bannon asserted. Trump is also preventing America
from becoming a “tributary state” of China.
Bannon, a 65-year-old Latin Mass–attending Catholic, said Rome is
throwing faithful Catholics in China under the bus by coming to an agreement
with President Xi, who is “more radical than Mao Zedong.” Reminding Arroyo
that Xi snubbed
the pope when he was in Italy last month, an astonished Bannon said
church buildings in China are being demolished on a daily basis and that
Chinese elites are destroying religion and acting like slave masters over
ordinary citizens. He called for openness and transparency on the “secret
deal” reached between the Vatican and China. Bannon suggested that Rome
listen to Cardinal
Zen of Hong Kong instead of “cutting deals with dictators.”
“Look, the pope is the vicar of Christ. Nobody makes an argument about
that … on the things of dogma and theology. But the administrative and the
political side of the Church are different,” he said.
Bannon spoke
at a roundtable event in Washington last month hosted
by an organization called the Committee on the Present Danger: China.
Among the group’s founding members is Dr. Steven Mosher, an expert on
population control and China whose essays have
appeared on LifeSiteNews.
Bannon also called out Pope Francis for going after the “populist,
nationalist sovereignty movement” and for taking “the side of the globalists
— the Macrons of the world, the Merkels of the world — in every situation.”
Bannon said it’s “unacceptable” for the pope to “hammer” and "deride”
politicians and Catholics who are simply trying to solve the migrant crisis
in order to get their countries back so they don’t implode. Catholic social
teaching on immigration should revolve around sovereignty and subsidiarity.
Bannon, who previously
accused U.S. Bishops of being “one of the worst instigators" of open
borders, is not the only Catholic concerned with immigration. African
Cardinal Robert Sarah, the current prefect for the Vatican’s Congregation
for Divine Worship, has warned that there are some who are exploiting the
Word of God to promote multiculturalism, an apparent swipe at Pope
Francis. He’s also predicted that Islam will “invade
the world” and that the “West
will disappear” if it is swamped with foreigners. The flow of migrants
into Europe is “tragic
for the identity of peoples," he's also stated. Bishop Athanasius
Schneider of Kazakhstan has similarly remarked that mass migration is an “orchestrated”
plan to water down Europe’s Christian heritage.
Bannon touted his Trisulti, Italy–based training
academy as a place where persons could visit in order to equip
themselves with the ideas and skills needed to go on television, into
boardrooms, and elsewhere in the public domain to defend “the nation state”
and Judeo-Christian values. He mentioned France’s Marion
Maréchal Le Pen as someone taking up the pro-sovereignty, anti-globalist
cause as well.
Interspersed throughout Arroyo’s and Bannon’s penetrating conversation
was the clergy abuse crisis, which Bannon referred to as the “greatest
crisis since the Reformation.” Bannon pointed out that the abuse summit in
Rome didn’t mention the phrase “zero tolerance.” He said there isn’t a real
plan in place to deal with the crisis and predicted the Church will face
RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) lawsuits. He advised
that the laity need to be involved in future oversight.
The interview concluded with Bannon calling the Trump-Russia collusion
story “the biggest hoax in American media history.” He said President Trump
is purposefully directing people’s attention to the shadowy beginnings of
the investigation. “Look, when President Trump starts using the word
‘treason’ and talks about the FBI ... when he says that guys at these
[television] networks should be fired, he’s coming off the chain. If the
Democratic Party thinks he’s going to pull back, he’s not.” Bannon suggested
that Trump’s
language at his rally in Grand Rapids, Michigan last month was an
indication he wants to go after the perpetrators of the hoax.
Following the death of journalist and reporter Mike Wallace, an
interview he conducted with Planned Parenthood founder and eugenicist
Margaret Sanger made the rounds across the Internet over the weekend.
Below are clips from the interview Margaret Sanger gave to Mike
Wallace in 1957. During the interview, the full version of which can be seen here,
Sanger talks to Wallace about why she became an advocate for birth
control, abortion, stopping so-called overpopulation, and talks about
the Catholic Church, and morality.
Angela Franks is one of the foremost authorities on the life and pro-abortion and pro-eugenics views of Sanger. She profiled Sanger for LifeNews in February:
Margaret Sanger was many things admirable: a vibrant personality, a
brilliant organizer, a canny reader of the temperature of the times, a
woman who built powerful institutions in a man’s world. But she was also
many things ugly and even despicable: an egotist who frequently clashed
with others; a free-love advocate who had a dizzying number of affairs
and who hurt many men as a result; and a eugenicist who argued that
“birth control is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the
process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives
or of those who will become defective.”
Even Planned Parenthood has had to drop the denials of Sanger’s
commitment to eugenics and now urges us all instead to avoid judging
those of another historical era. After all, as Hillary Clinton basically
said in 2009, Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, and he still did some
pretty nifty things. Take what you like and leave the rest, that’s the
new approach to Sanger.
Authored by James Thompson via The Unz Review, David Becker has released a new version of the World’s IQ.
Each country has a score showing the cognitive abilities of their
citizens, this being a blend of genetics and the environment of each
country, particularly as regards education and health. The world’s global score is 82.
This is 12th percentile rank on the Greenwich Mean Intelligence
benchmark of IQ 100. As school teachers used to say in end of year
reports: “Could do better”. What does IQ 82 mean in practical terms? The account
below gives the achievements as shown in Western economies, with free
education and usually free healthcare, and will need to be adjusted for
other economies, probably downwards to account for poorer educational
systems and the burdens of ill health.
Tribe 2 “Uphill Battle”
These are the next 20% of the population in terms of ability. They
would be 2,000 citizens in the town of 10,000 inhabitants. Learning is
somewhat faster, and achievements are of better quality. Learning varies
from the slow pace, simple materials and careful supervision already
mentioned previously, to very explicit, hands-on training. They tend to
credulity, belief in god and superstition. They can locate the
intersection of two streets on a map, identify two features in a
newspaper sports story, perhaps calculate the total cost of purchases
listed in a catalogue, and draw inferences from two identifiable facts
and deal with some distractors.
Vocabularies are somewhat larger, computation includes some
multiplication and division. In terms of reading they will enjoy a
little more depth in terms of content. Employment opportunities include
simple assembly and packaging tasks, food preparation, assistant roles
in caring professions. They can use some checklists, and procedural
guides. The armed services will probably not recruit them, because many
of them will take too long to train.
They have a 21% lower survival up to age 76 (Whalley&Deary 2001).
They have about a 50% greater risk of hospitalization for
schizophrenia, mood disorder, and alcohol-related disorders (Gale et al.
2010) and for personality disorders (Moran et al. 2009) with more
self-reported psychological distress (Gale et al. 2009) and with a
greater risk of vascular dementia (McGurn et al. 2008).
They will probably have fast lifestyles, with restricted planning and
savings. They have more accidents than average, probably twice as many
motor vehicle accidents than average. In IQ terms they are between 75
and 90.
As a rule of thumb we can say that in the US the average male at IQ
82 would be earning very roughly $43,000 (in 2011 dollars) as compared
with $ 63,500 for men of average intelligence. Naturally, this would be
far more than in other countries of the world, but shows the nature of
the market penalty for low ability.
Another take on the meaning of intelligence, this post by Anatoly
Karlin looks at individual maths test items, and links each item to what
it might mean for impact on the economy.
For example, here is a level 3 item, which would already be causing trouble to some at the 12th percentile.
There has been a lot of animus against country intelligence scores.
As explained before, data quality varies between countries. You already
knew that, because if countries really differ in intelligence, that will
show in the way they conduct themselves. Some countries will do forward
planning, and others will do less. Some will conduct regular censuses
and surveys, and others won’t. Some countries may have people who are
more willing to cheat than other countries. http://www.unz.com/jthompson/do-brighter-minds-incline-to-honesty/?highlight=Gachter
Becker has made a number of improvements, all of which are listed in
his published spreadsheets. To my mind the best addition is to have an
additional column where country IQs are given corrected for sample size
and data quality.
The database also includes intelligence estimates derived from
scholastic attainment tests. Yes, these ought to be different from
intelligence test results, for both practical and theoretical reasons,
but in fact they are remarkably similar at the country level. In the
chart at the bottom of this post the scores shown are intelligence test
results supplemented by PISA and TIMSS scholastic scores, which
increases the numbers of countries for which estimates can be given.
Naturally, country level data may obscure regional differences, and
caste, tribe, class and religious differences. These are matters of
granularity. Some countries are homogenous as regards talent (China may
be in this category) others are not (India).
Country IQs may explain how that country conducts its affairs.
Intellectual assessments ought to have explanatory value, thus leading
to greater wealth, and discrepancies need to be investigated and
explained. Two main sources of economic discrepancy are tourism and
natural resources: the presence of either can inflate economies which
lack human capital.
Another attack on country intelligence comparisons relates to idea
that cultures differ so much that standard international assessments are
impossible. This is a perilous argument, since if it is truly the case
that a particular national culture does not understand the notion of
progressions and sequences, or the basics of arithmetic, then there is a
temptation to avoid the country completely, at least as regards
investment. Indeed, if this were true one should never fly on a national
airline of such a country, or drive a car on such a country’s roads.
There are many points of interest.
The deleterious effects of consanguineous marriage are shown here:
As you know, I don’t do policy, but it would be good to give wider publicity to this graph.
The results for individual countries vary somewhat according to the
method used, but these are probably the very best estimates, mostly
using psychometric tests but supplementing them with closely correlated
maths and science attainment tests, which increases accuracy and country
coverage.
This list is useful and you may find it worth printing out. It would
fit nicely on the back of a door.
Yes, it mixes environmental and
genetic effects, but it gives you a rule of thumb as to what countries,
on average, are capable of doing. It can be expected that rising
standards of living will boost results, though the rate of intellectual
improvement has been slow in many newly rich countries despite more
education funding. Convergence with European levels might be within 80
to 300 years. Each country will have cognitive elites, though by
absolute international standards they will be fewer in countries with
lower ability. Have a look at Becker’s detailed databases, and start testing your hypotheses.
"Not many NZ people don't know NZ
is a registered corporation at the SEC-registered to The Queen under her
official corporate titles. The nation is controlled through her
representative the Governor General who has letters of patent
authorizing them. This contravenes Article 4 of the United Nations, the
right of a nation to self-determination. In NZ when the government
creates law it is not official until signed off by the Governor
General."
by Anonymous (henrymakow.com) The Censorship here has been insane.
The NZ online Media uses a site
called Stuff nz. The chief editor is a Freemason from my hometown, Glen
Scanlon. That is how they are able to coordinate this.
I have a TOR browser. By 9 AM the
day after the shooting I could see some sites were not loading, Zero
Hedge for one. When I accessed Zero Hedge it was obvious they had
censored it because Rush Limbaugh had suggested it was a false flag and
the shooter could really be a left winger posing as a right-winger.
I kept looking over the next
couple of hours and found the Turkish government had videos of the guy
trying to get people to oppose the Turkish leader in the last series of
elections. They said without a doubt the guy was a US asset. They said
they had the guy on their watch-list since 2012. This is censored in NZ.
It is dangerous because Turkey is threatening NZ and the NZ people
don't know why. The Turks see clearly this is a cover-up.
In the NZ Media, they censored the
gunman's travel movements. They told us where he went in Europe and for
how long but left out his time in Israel where it is believed he
received paramilitary training. They also left out his trip to the UK
from France where he is alleged to have visited MI6 HQ before travelling
to the Temple Bar district. That source is not able to be verified but
they claim a photo of him exists leaving MI6 HQ.
The Third largest internet router
in the world is in CHCH NZ. Makes no sense to have it here, until you
look across the road and understand the building opposite is a NSA/CIA
data intel gathering operation plugged straight in. NZ has been a
testbed for NWO operations. We have had a cashless/cash economy for 30
years with plastic cards making cash rare to see these days. They tested
the Echelon program here before rolling it out elsewhere. NZ activist
Nikki Hagar testified in the UK about it and wrote a book about.
From the moment NZ said they were
on high terror attack alert, they switched on a system which is
listening to every call and tapping people's cell phones. I believe this
is how they knew who the eyewitnesses were and who to round up and
threaten in the night. At least 2 other shooters were seen and at least
one getaway driver (a woman). Initial reports have the police capturing
these people then saying they were released because they had nothing to
do with it and it was suggested they were civilians.
A Sharp Shooter competition was
being held that day just outside of CHCH in Melton. Those foreigners
were given instant authority to help. That is not lawful or legal in NZ
without Governor Generals' say so as they are the ultimate control of
NZ.
Not many NZ people don't know NZ
is a registered corporation at the SEC-registered to The Queen under her
official corporate titles. The nation is controlled through her
representative the Governor General who has letters of patent
authorizing them. This contravenes Article 4 of the United Nations, the
right of a nation to self-determination. In NZ when the government
creates law it is not official until signed off by the Governor General.
This information was obtained 15 years ago and the MP who was asked to
look into had been a career politician for 30 years and confessed he
didn't know that is how the nation ran.
People in CHCH say the gunman
cannot have got from A to B in the time shown on the vid as it takes 15
minutes in Friday traffic. They say would need a police escort. We see
once again the footage streamed must have been faked as the Mosque shown
in the vid does not match the one in real life, different carpets. In
NZ to view it a 10-year jail sentence.
The manifesto is obviously bogus.
In NZ and AU, you are taught English Spelling and American Spelling used
to be punished by strapping. The Manifesto is full of US spelling. Once
again for any NZ'er to view this is 10 years in jail.
I have been pointing out to people
our soldiers who fought WWII did so because the Nazi's ethics were
incompatible with our values. They fought to never be censored by their
government or have Opinion Criminalized.
My grandmother would often defend
people who were obviously wrong from being verbally attacked by others.
She told us "People have a right to be wrong. Millions of young men died
for that right." NZ is proposing Hate Speech laws, Criminalization of Opinion.
The rights those young men paid for were paid in Blood.
NZ has been censored online for
some years. Under the last government is was discovered NZ'ers had been
censored online for 6 months before discovery and admission by the NZ
govt. The Media acted as if it meant nothing.
The NZ govt censors the NZ Media
on average 28 times a year. If you look internationally to see what was
censored it is not matters of national security, but just things that
would damage the reputation of the sitting government of the day with
voters. Utterly corrupt aided and abetted by the Freemasons who head our
Media.
The NZ PM gets her Media Power
from her PR person, who is not an NZ'er and appears to be MI6. All the
international promotion of her is through him and his connections to
international Media.
He
was also the PR person for Helen Clark, left, the previous female
Labour Party leader who ruled as PM for nearly a decade. She was gifted a
top job at the UN afterwards for her service to the NWO and nearly got
the top job. Her task was to get Universal ID implemented by stealth in
NZ via everyone's drivers License which includes a photo of you which is
used in facial recognition.
NZ drivers licenses have a hidden
chip in them which is read by near field readers installed on NZ roads. I
watched them being installed 12 years ago around the nation. The
official story is they are to monitor trucking and heavy trucks. They
just tested it for the USA who will roll it out if they have not already
in one form or another.
GMO corn was tested in NZ. PM
Helen Clark (another female Freemason, Order of The Eastern Star)
approved it despite protests of the potential danger when she was the
leader of NZ.
In 2003, German historian Wolfgang Eggert sounded the alarm about the Cabalist doomsday cult whose thinking now pervades the Trump Whitehouse.
Today he says it is vital that the Christchurch massacre fraud be exposed. He says:
"The Christchurch „massacre" is
our chance to destroy the power of mainstream media narratives. Although
in most cases I usually reject the classification of terror attacks as
hoaxes, this one seems to be such a false flag non-incident. And it
threatens all of us truthers. The looming threat for us to be muzzled by
increasingly rigid internet legislation is now spread by the mainstream
media on a daily basis since 15th March. We have to fight this shutdown.
We do that best by eventually (!) once (!) clarifying/solving one -
THIS- "terror" case completely." (more)
